Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51951
Título: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus sclerotherapy in the elective treatment of variceal hemorrhage
Autores/as: Cabrera, J.
Maynar Moliner, Manuel 
Granados, R.
Gorriz, E.
Reyes, R.
Pulido-Duque, J. M.
SanRoman, J. L.R.
Guerra, C.
Kravetz, D.
Clasificación UNESCO: 32 Ciencias médicas
320503 Gastroenterología
Palabras clave: Distal Splenorenal Shunt
Hepatic-Encephalopathy
Endoscopic Sclerotherapy
Portacaval-Shunt
Controlled Trial, et al.
Fecha de publicación: 1996
Publicación seriada: Gastroenterology 
Resumen: Background & Aims: Uncontrolled studies suggest that placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) could be useful in the treatment of variceal bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TIPS in the elective treatment of hemorrhage from esophageal varices in a randomized controlled study that compared the effects of TIPS with those of endoscopic sclerotherapy (ES). Methods: Sixty-three consecutive cirrhotic patients with a hemorrhage from esophageal varices were included. Thirty-two patients were randomly allocated to ES and 31 to TIPS groups. Results: One patient in each group died before the therapeutic procedure could be performed. During a mean follow-up period of 15 months, variceal rebleeding occurred in 51.6% of the patients in the ES group and 23% of those in the TIPS group. Uncontrolled rebleeding occurred in 10 of 31 patients in the ES group, whereas rebleeding did not occur in any patient of the TIPS group. Hepatic encephalopathy was more frequent in TIPS patients (33.3%) than in those treated by ES (13%). However, mortality was similar in both treatment groups. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that TIPS is more effective than ES in the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients, even though no difference in survival was observed.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51951
ISSN: 0016-5085
DOI: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8608893
Fuente: Gastroenterology[ISSN 0016-5085],v. 110, p. 832-839
Colección:Artículos
Vista completa

Citas SCOPUSTM   

220
actualizado el 17-nov-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

189
actualizado el 17-nov-2024

Visitas

83
actualizado el 17-feb-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.