Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51951
Title: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus sclerotherapy in the elective treatment of variceal hemorrhage
Authors: Cabrera, J.
Maynar, M.
Granados, R.
Gorriz, E.
Reyes, R.
Pulido-Duque, J. M.
SanRoman, J. L.R.
Guerra, C.
Kravetz, D.
Keywords: Distal Splenorenal Shunt
Hepatic-Encephalopathy
Endoscopic Sclerotherapy
Portacaval-Shunt
Controlled Trial
Stent-Shunt
Tips
Perspectives
Issue Date: 1996
Publisher: 0016-5085
Journal: Gastroenterology 
Abstract: Background & Aims: Uncontrolled studies suggest that placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) could be useful in the treatment of variceal bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TIPS in the elective treatment of hemorrhage from esophageal varices in a randomized controlled study that compared the effects of TIPS with those of endoscopic sclerotherapy (ES). Methods: Sixty-three consecutive cirrhotic patients with a hemorrhage from esophageal varices were included. Thirty-two patients were randomly allocated to ES and 31 to TIPS groups. Results: One patient in each group died before the therapeutic procedure could be performed. During a mean follow-up period of 15 months, variceal rebleeding occurred in 51.6% of the patients in the ES group and 23% of those in the TIPS group. Uncontrolled rebleeding occurred in 10 of 31 patients in the ES group, whereas rebleeding did not occur in any patient of the TIPS group. Hepatic encephalopathy was more frequent in TIPS patients (33.3%) than in those treated by ES (13%). However, mortality was similar in both treatment groups. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that TIPS is more effective than ES in the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients, even though no difference in survival was observed.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51951
ISSN: 0016-5085
DOI: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8608893
Source: Gastroenterology[ISSN 0016-5085],v. 110, p. 832-839
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

208
checked on Feb 28, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

184
checked on Jan 17, 2021

Page view(s)

16
checked on Feb 28, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.