Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/115553
Título: | Oral saliva swab reverse transcription PCR for Covid-19 in the paediatric population | Autores/as: | Moraleda, Cinta Domínguez Rodríguez, Sara Mesa, Juan Miguel García Sánchez, Paula de la Serna, María Alonso Cadenas, José Antonio Bermejo, Amanda Sabrido, Gema Martínez Campos, Leticia González Posada, Aránzazu Flavia Illán Ramos, Marta Cobos Carrascosa, Elena Ballesteros, Álvaro Galán, Juan Carlos Llorente, Francisco Aguilera Alonso, David Jiménez, Ana Belén Catalán, Pilar Dahdouh, Elias Navarro, Ignacio Fernández Garoz, Bárbara Mendoza, Pablo Pérez Jorge, Concepción Cabezas Fernández, Teresa Blázquez Gamero, Daniel Rivas, Gonzalo González Donapetry, Patricia Sáez, Elena Fernández Pinero, Jovita Lucas Fernández, Jesús Pérez Ramírez, Elisa Merino, Paloma Miragaya, Sandra Lorente, Jorge Iglesias, Irene Tagarro, Alfredo Peña Quintana, Luis |
Clasificación UNESCO: | 32 Ciencias médicas 320110 Pediatría 320505 Enfermedades infecciosas |
Palabras clave: | SARS-CoV-2 PCR Saliva test Antigen rapid diagnostic test Nasopharyngeal swabs |
Fecha de publicación: | 2022 | Publicación seriada: | Archives of disease in childhood | Resumen: | Objectives To evaluate the performance of oral saliva swab (OSS) reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) compared with RT-PCR and antigen rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) on nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) for SARS-CoV-2 in children. Design Cross-sectional multicentre diagnostic study. Setting Study nested in a prospective, observational cohort (EPICO-AEP) performed between February and March 2021 including 10 hospitals in Spain. Patients Children from 0 to 18 years with symptoms compatible with Covid-19 of ≤5 days of duration were included. Two NPS samples (Ag-RDT and RT-PCR) and one OSS sample for RT-PCR were collected. Main outcome Performance of Ag-RDT and RT-PCR on NPS and RT-PCR on OSS sample for SARS-CoV-2. Results 1174 children were included, aged 3.8 years (IQR 1.7–9.0); 73/1174 (6.2%) patients tested positive by at least one of the techniques. Sensitivity and specificity of OSS RT-PCR were 72.1% (95% CI 59.7 to 81.9) and 99.6% (95% CI 99 to 99.9), respectively, versus 61.8% (95% CI 49.1 to 73) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.4 to 100) for the Ag-RDT. Kappa index was 0.79 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.88) for OSS RT-PCR and 0.74 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.84) for Ag-RDT versus NPS RT-PCR. Conclusions RT-PCR on the OSS sample is an accurate option for SARS-CoV-2 testing in children. A less intrusive technique for younger patients, who usually are tested frequently, might increase the number of patients tested. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/115553 | ISSN: | 1468-2044 | DOI: | 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323712 | Fuente: | Archives of Disease in Childhood [1468-2044], p.1-8 (Junio 2022) |
Colección: | Artículos |
Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
actualizado el 17-nov-2024
Visitas
62
actualizado el 27-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Verifica
Altmetric
Comparte
Exporta metadatos
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.