Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75042
Título: Immediate Results and Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Patients With Unprotected Distal Left Main Restenosis The CORPAL Registry (Cordoba and Las Palmas)
Autores/as: Ojeda, Soledad
Pan, Manuel
Martin, Pedro 
Mazuelos, Francisco
Suarez de Lezo, Javier
Romero, Miguel
Segura, Jose
Pavlovic, Djordje
Medina, Alfonso
Suarez de Lezo, Jose
Clasificación UNESCO: 320501 Cardiología
320704 Patología cardiovascular
321307 Cirugía del corazón
Palabras clave: Coronary-Artery-Disease
Drug-Eluting Stent
Bypass-Surgery
Bifurcation Lesions
Intervention, et al.
Fecha de publicación: 2014
Publicación seriada: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 
Resumen: Objectives The goal of this study was to assess the immediate and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in an unprotected distal left main coronary artery (UDLM).Background PCI for UDLM-ISR can be complex. Limited information is available on procedural and clinical outcomes. Methods Between May 2002 and February 2011, UDLM-ISR after drug-eluting stent implantation was observed in 79 of 1,102 patients (7%). Seventy-five were treated by repeat PCI using a simple approach (balloon/in-stent implantation) or a complex strategy (additional stent/double-stenting technique). A diagnosis of mild or severe restenosis was considered depending on the number of bifurcation segments affected (1 vs. >1). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and myocardial infarction.Results ISR treatment was performed using a simple approach in 44 (58%) patients, and using a complex strategy in 31 (42%). After 46 +/- 26 months, the MACE rate was 22%. Patients treated with a simple approach had a lower incidence of MACE at follow-up compared with patients treated with a complex strategy, regardless of the restenosis extent (mild restenosis: 93% vs. 67%, p < 0.05; severe: 70% vs. 23%, p < 0.05). On Cox regression analysis, diabetes was the only predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 23.70; p < 0.05), whereas a simple strategy for ISR treatment was associated with lower risk (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.79; p = 0.02).Conclusions PCI for UDLM-ISR is safe and feasible, with a high rate of procedural success and an acceptable long-term MACE rate. A simple strategy, when applicable, appears to be a good treatment option, associated with a lower event rate at follow-up. (C) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75042
ISSN: 1936-8798
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.017
Fuente: Jacc-Cardiovascular Interventions [ISSN 1936-8798], v. 7 (2), p. 212-221, (Febrero 2014)
Colección:Artículos
miniatura
Adobe PDF (1,19 MB)
Vista completa

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.