Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75042
Título: Immediate Results and Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Patients With Unprotected Distal Left Main Restenosis The CORPAL Registry (Cordoba and Las Palmas)
Autores/as: Ojeda, Soledad
Pan, Manuel
Martin, Pedro 
Mazuelos, Francisco
Suarez de Lezo, Javier
Romero, Miguel
Segura, Jose
Pavlovic, Djordje
Medina, Alfonso
Suarez de Lezo, Jose
Clasificación UNESCO: 320501 Cardiología
320704 Patología cardiovascular
321307 Cirugía del corazón
Palabras clave: Coronary-Artery-Disease
Drug-Eluting Stent
Bypass-Surgery
Bifurcation Lesions
Intervention, et al.
Fecha de publicación: 2014
Publicación seriada: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 
Resumen: Objectives The goal of this study was to assess the immediate and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in an unprotected distal left main coronary artery (UDLM).Background PCI for UDLM-ISR can be complex. Limited information is available on procedural and clinical outcomes. Methods Between May 2002 and February 2011, UDLM-ISR after drug-eluting stent implantation was observed in 79 of 1,102 patients (7%). Seventy-five were treated by repeat PCI using a simple approach (balloon/in-stent implantation) or a complex strategy (additional stent/double-stenting technique). A diagnosis of mild or severe restenosis was considered depending on the number of bifurcation segments affected (1 vs. >1). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and myocardial infarction.Results ISR treatment was performed using a simple approach in 44 (58%) patients, and using a complex strategy in 31 (42%). After 46 +/- 26 months, the MACE rate was 22%. Patients treated with a simple approach had a lower incidence of MACE at follow-up compared with patients treated with a complex strategy, regardless of the restenosis extent (mild restenosis: 93% vs. 67%, p < 0.05; severe: 70% vs. 23%, p < 0.05). On Cox regression analysis, diabetes was the only predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 23.70; p < 0.05), whereas a simple strategy for ISR treatment was associated with lower risk (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.79; p = 0.02).Conclusions PCI for UDLM-ISR is safe and feasible, with a high rate of procedural success and an acceptable long-term MACE rate. A simple strategy, when applicable, appears to be a good treatment option, associated with a lower event rate at follow-up. (C) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75042
ISSN: 1936-8798
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.017
Fuente: Jacc-Cardiovascular Interventions [ISSN 1936-8798], v. 7 (2), p. 212-221, (Febrero 2014)
Colección:Artículos
miniatura
Adobe PDF (1,19 MB)
Vista completa

Citas SCOPUSTM   

16
actualizado el 15-dic-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
actualizado el 15-dic-2024

Visitas

81
actualizado el 14-dic-2024

Descargas

193
actualizado el 14-dic-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.