Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75042
Title: Immediate Results and Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Patients With Unprotected Distal Left Main Restenosis The CORPAL Registry (Cordoba and Las Palmas)
Authors: Ojeda, Soledad
Pan, Manuel
Martin, Pedro 
Mazuelos, Francisco
Suarez de Lezo, Javier
Romero, Miguel
Segura, Jose
Pavlovic, Djordje
Medina, Alfonso
Suarez de Lezo, Jose
UNESCO Clasification: 320501 Cardiología
320704 Patología cardiovascular
321307 Cirugía del corazón
Keywords: Coronary-Artery-Disease
Drug-Eluting Stent
Bypass-Surgery
Bifurcation Lesions
Intervention, et al
Issue Date: 2014
Journal: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 
Abstract: Objectives The goal of this study was to assess the immediate and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in an unprotected distal left main coronary artery (UDLM).Background PCI for UDLM-ISR can be complex. Limited information is available on procedural and clinical outcomes. Methods Between May 2002 and February 2011, UDLM-ISR after drug-eluting stent implantation was observed in 79 of 1,102 patients (7%). Seventy-five were treated by repeat PCI using a simple approach (balloon/in-stent implantation) or a complex strategy (additional stent/double-stenting technique). A diagnosis of mild or severe restenosis was considered depending on the number of bifurcation segments affected (1 vs. >1). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and myocardial infarction.Results ISR treatment was performed using a simple approach in 44 (58%) patients, and using a complex strategy in 31 (42%). After 46 +/- 26 months, the MACE rate was 22%. Patients treated with a simple approach had a lower incidence of MACE at follow-up compared with patients treated with a complex strategy, regardless of the restenosis extent (mild restenosis: 93% vs. 67%, p < 0.05; severe: 70% vs. 23%, p < 0.05). On Cox regression analysis, diabetes was the only predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 23.70; p < 0.05), whereas a simple strategy for ISR treatment was associated with lower risk (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.79; p = 0.02).Conclusions PCI for UDLM-ISR is safe and feasible, with a high rate of procedural success and an acceptable long-term MACE rate. A simple strategy, when applicable, appears to be a good treatment option, associated with a lower event rate at follow-up. (C) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75042
ISSN: 1936-8798
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.017
Source: Jacc-Cardiovascular Interventions [ISSN 1936-8798], v. 7 (2), p. 212-221, (Febrero 2014)
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Thumbnail
Adobe PDF (1,19 MB)
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.