Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/69772
Título: | Quality indicators in radiation oncology: proposal of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) for a continuous improvement of the quality of care in oncology | Autores/as: | López Torrecilla, J. Marín i Borràs, S. Ruiz-Alonso, A. Jaen Olasolo, J. Vázquez de la Torre, M. L. Bóveda Carro, E. Rodríguez, A. Ignacio García, E. Caballero Martínez, F. Campos Lucas, F. J. Lara Jiménez, Pedro Carlos Martínez, J. Contreras Ferrer Albiach, C. |
Clasificación UNESCO: | 320101 Oncología | Palabras clave: | Consensus Delphi Healthcare Services Quality Indicators Radiation Oncology |
Fecha de publicación: | 2019 | Publicación seriada: | Clinical and Translational Oncology | Resumen: | Purpose: Current cancer treatment options include surgical intervention, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The quality of the provision of each of them and their effective coordination determines the results in terms of benefit/risk. Regarding the radiation oncology treatments, there are not stabilised quality indicators to be used to perform control and continuous improvement processes for healthcare services. Therefore, the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology has undertaken a comprehensive project to establish quality indicators for use with the information systems available in most Spanish healthcare services. Methods: A two-round Delphi study examines consensus of several possible quality indicators (n = 28) in daily practice. These indicators were defined after a bibliographic search and the assessment by radiation oncology specialists (n = 8). They included aspects regarding treatment equipment, patient preparation, treatment, and follow-up processes and were divided in structure, process, and outcome indicators. Results: After the evaluation of the defined quality indicators (n = 28) by an expert panel (38 radiation oncologist), 26 indicators achieved consensus in terms of agreement with the statement. Two quality indicators did not achieve consensus. Conclusions: There is a high degree of consensus in Spanish Radiation Oncology specialists on which indicators in routine clinical practice can best measure quality. These indicators can be used to classify services based on several parameters (patients, equipments, complexity of the techniques used, and scientific research). Furthermore, these indicators allow assess our current situation and set improvements’ objectives. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/69772 | ISSN: | 1699-048X | DOI: | 10.1007/s12094-018-1943-z | Fuente: | Clinical and Translational Oncology [ISSN 1699-048X], v. 21 (4), p. 519-533 |
Colección: | Artículos |
Citas SCOPUSTM
13
actualizado el 17-nov-2024
Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
13
actualizado el 17-nov-2024
Visitas
103
actualizado el 04-may-2024
Google ScholarTM
Verifica
Altmetric
Comparte
Exporta metadatos
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.