Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/69772
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorLópez Torrecilla, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMarín i Borràs, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Alonso, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJaen Olasolo, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVázquez de la Torre, M. L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBóveda Carro, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIgnacio García, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCaballero Martínez, F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCampos Lucas, F. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLara Jiménez, Pedro Carlosen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartínez, J. Contrerasen_US
dc.contributor.authorFerrer Albiach, C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T12:49:58Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-05T12:49:58Z-
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.issn1699-048Xen_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/69772-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Current cancer treatment options include surgical intervention, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The quality of the provision of each of them and their effective coordination determines the results in terms of benefit/risk. Regarding the radiation oncology treatments, there are not stabilised quality indicators to be used to perform control and continuous improvement processes for healthcare services. Therefore, the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology has undertaken a comprehensive project to establish quality indicators for use with the information systems available in most Spanish healthcare services. Methods: A two-round Delphi study examines consensus of several possible quality indicators (n = 28) in daily practice. These indicators were defined after a bibliographic search and the assessment by radiation oncology specialists (n = 8). They included aspects regarding treatment equipment, patient preparation, treatment, and follow-up processes and were divided in structure, process, and outcome indicators. Results: After the evaluation of the defined quality indicators (n = 28) by an expert panel (38 radiation oncologist), 26 indicators achieved consensus in terms of agreement with the statement. Two quality indicators did not achieve consensus. Conclusions: There is a high degree of consensus in Spanish Radiation Oncology specialists on which indicators in routine clinical practice can best measure quality. These indicators can be used to classify services based on several parameters (patients, equipments, complexity of the techniques used, and scientific research). Furthermore, these indicators allow assess our current situation and set improvements’ objectives.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Translational Oncologyen_US
dc.sourceClinical and Translational Oncology [ISSN 1699-048X], v. 21 (4), p. 519-533en_US
dc.subject320101 Oncologíaen_US
dc.subject.otherConsensusen_US
dc.subject.otherDelphien_US
dc.subject.otherHealthcare Servicesen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality Indicatorsen_US
dc.subject.otherRadiation Oncologyen_US
dc.titleQuality indicators in radiation oncology: proposal of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) for a continuous improvement of the quality of care in oncologyen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12094-018-1943-zen_US
dc.identifier.scopus85055355444-
dc.identifier.isi000461394500015-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603185837-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7801635501-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57200965090-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506712196-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506220958-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57204359903-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56579538100-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57204362671-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602534757-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57204361725-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6504824791-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56370369900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506663985-
dc.description.lastpage533en_US
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.description.firstpage519en_US
dc.relation.volume21en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid298157-
dc.contributor.daisngid4380629-
dc.contributor.daisngid13389906-
dc.contributor.daisngid4269718-
dc.contributor.daisngid470484-
dc.contributor.daisngid19001194-
dc.contributor.daisngid7158247-
dc.contributor.daisngid7817658-
dc.contributor.daisngid1410666-
dc.contributor.daisngid2889765-
dc.contributor.daisngid4129545-
dc.contributor.daisngid6965344-
dc.contributor.daisngid2470906-
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Torrecilla, JL-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Borras, SMI-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Ruiz-Alonso, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Olasolo, JJ-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:de la Torre, MLV-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Carro, EB-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Rodriguez, Ana-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Garcia, EI-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Martinez, FC-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Lucas, FJC-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Jimenez, PCL-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Martinez, JC-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Albiach, CF-
dc.date.coverdateAbril 2019en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,833
dc.description.jcr2,737
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ3
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.fullNameLara Jiménez, Pedro Carlos-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

11
actualizado el 14-abr-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
actualizado el 25-feb-2024

Visitas

97
actualizado el 24-feb-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.