Estas en:
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/55391
Title: Reproducibility and Repeatability of Five Different Technologies for Bar Velocity Measurement in Resistance Training
Authors: Courel-Ibáñez, Javier
Martínez-Cava, Alejandro
Morán-Navarro, Ricardo
Escribano-Peñas, Pablo
Chavarren-Cabrero, Javier 
González-Badillo, Juan José
Pallarés, Jesús G
Keywords: 241106 Fisiología del ejercicio
metadata.dc.subject.other: Exercise testing
Monitoring
Standard error of measurement
Strength performance
Validity
Velocity-based resistance training
Issue Date: 2019
Journal: Annals of Biomedical Engineering 
Abstract: This study aimed to analyze the agreement between five bar velocity monitoring devices, currently used in resistance training, to determine the most reliable device based on reproducibility (between-device agreement for a given trial) and repeatability (between-trial variation for each device). Seventeen resistance-trained men performed duplicate trials against seven increasing loads (20-30-40-50-60-70-80 kg) while obtaining mean, mean propulsive and peak velocity outcomes in the bench press, full squat and prone bench pull exercises. Measurements were simultaneously registered by two linear velocity transducers (LVT), two linear position transducers (LPT), two optoelectronic camera-based systems (OEC), two smartphone video-based systems (VBS) and one accelerometer (ACC). A comprehensive set of statistics for assessing reliability was used. Magnitude of errors was reported both in absolute (m s-1) and relative terms (%1RM), and included the smallest detectable change (SDC) and maximum errors (MaxError). LVT was the most reliable and sensitive device (SDC 0.02-0.06 m s-1, MaxError 3.4-7.1% 1RM) and the preferred reference to compare with other technologies. OEC and LPT were the second-best alternatives (SDC 0.06-0.11 m s-1), always considering the particular margins of error for each exercise and velocity outcome. ACC and VBS are not recommended given their substantial errors and uncertainty of the measurements (SDC > 0.13 m s-1).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/55391
ISSN: 0090-6964
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-019-02265-6
metadata.dc.source: Annals of Biomedical Engineering [ISSN 0090-6964], p. 1-16
Appears in Collections:Artículos

Show full item record

Page view(s)

10
checked on May 25, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.