Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51139
Title: Can Defaults Save the Climate? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Carbon Offsetting Programs
Authors: Arana, Jorge E. 
León González, Carmelo Javier 
Keywords: Choice Contingent Valuation
Elicitation
Preferences
Psychology
Economics, et al
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: 0924-6460
Journal: Environmental and Resource Economics 
Abstract: Individual preferences for environmental policies can be influenced by the frame in which choices and decisions are presented. In this paper we present results of a field experiment on the contributions to carbon offsetting programs under two alternative treatments for the default option. The opt-in treatment asked subjects to pay for the policy proposal while the opt-out treatment asked subjects if they wanted to be excluded from payment for the policy proposal. The results show that the frame of the default option had a significant effect on the amount of money paid for the policy proposal. Subjects were more likely to accept the policy proposal if the default option was the opt-out treatment. The results have implications for the design of environmental policies.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51139
ISSN: 0924-6460
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-012-9615-x
Source: Environmental & Resource Economics[ISSN 0924-6460],v. 54 (4), p. 613-626
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

39
checked on Jun 26, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

36
checked on Jun 26, 2022

Page view(s)

46
checked on Jun 18, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.