Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51139
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArana, Jorge E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLeón González, Carmelo Javieren_US
dc.contributor.otherArana, Jorge-
dc.contributor.otherSuarez, Beatriz-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T21:48:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-24T21:48:35Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.issn0924-6460en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/51139-
dc.description.abstractIndividual preferences for environmental policies can be influenced by the frame in which choices and decisions are presented. In this paper we present results of a field experiment on the contributions to carbon offsetting programs under two alternative treatments for the default option. The opt-in treatment asked subjects to pay for the policy proposal while the opt-out treatment asked subjects if they wanted to be excluded from payment for the policy proposal. The results show that the frame of the default option had a significant effect on the amount of money paid for the policy proposal. Subjects were more likely to accept the policy proposal if the default option was the opt-out treatment. The results have implications for the design of environmental policies.en_US
dc.languagespaen_US
dc.publisher0924-6460
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental and Resource Economicsen_US
dc.sourceEnvironmental & Resource Economics[ISSN 0924-6460],v. 54 (4), p. 613-626en_US
dc.subject.otherChoice Contingent Valuation
dc.subject.otherElicitation
dc.subject.otherPreferences
dc.subject.otherPsychology
dc.subject.otherEconomics
dc.subject.otherEmotions
dc.titleCan Defaults Save the Climate? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Carbon Offsetting Programsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10640-012-9615-xen_US
dc.identifier.scopus84875457826-
dc.identifier.isi000316757000007-
dcterms.isPartOfEnvironmental & Resource Economics
dcterms.sourceEnvironmental & Resource Economics[ISSN 0924-6460],v. 54 (4), p. 613-626
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005207170-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7101886256-
dc.description.lastpage626en_US
dc.description.firstpage613en_US
dc.relation.volume54en_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000316757000007-
dc.contributor.daisngid641205-
dc.contributor.daisngid597168-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDD-1139-2011-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDL-6377-2014-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Arana, JE-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Leon, CJ-
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2013en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr1,682
dc.description.jcr1,703
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.ssciSSCI
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Economía, medioambiente, sostenibilidad y turismo-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0878-9934-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9451-4093-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.fullNameAraña Padilla, Jorge-
crisitem.author.fullNameLeón González, Carmelo Javier-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

39
checked on Jun 26, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

36
checked on Jun 26, 2022

Page view(s)

46
checked on Jun 18, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.