Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51139
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorArana, Jorge E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLeón González, Carmelo Javieren_US
dc.contributor.otherArana, Jorge-
dc.contributor.otherSuarez, Beatriz-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T21:48:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-24T21:48:35Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.issn0924-6460en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/51139-
dc.description.abstractIndividual preferences for environmental policies can be influenced by the frame in which choices and decisions are presented. In this paper we present results of a field experiment on the contributions to carbon offsetting programs under two alternative treatments for the default option. The opt-in treatment asked subjects to pay for the policy proposal while the opt-out treatment asked subjects if they wanted to be excluded from payment for the policy proposal. The results show that the frame of the default option had a significant effect on the amount of money paid for the policy proposal. Subjects were more likely to accept the policy proposal if the default option was the opt-out treatment. The results have implications for the design of environmental policies.en_US
dc.languagespaen_US
dc.publisher0924-6460
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental and Resource Economicsen_US
dc.sourceEnvironmental & Resource Economics[ISSN 0924-6460],v. 54 (4), p. 613-626en_US
dc.subject.otherChoice Contingent Valuation
dc.subject.otherElicitation
dc.subject.otherPreferences
dc.subject.otherPsychology
dc.subject.otherEconomics
dc.subject.otherEmotions
dc.titleCan Defaults Save the Climate? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Carbon Offsetting Programsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10640-012-9615-xen_US
dc.identifier.scopus84875457826-
dc.identifier.isi000316757000007-
dcterms.isPartOfEnvironmental & Resource Economics
dcterms.sourceEnvironmental & Resource Economics[ISSN 0924-6460],v. 54 (4), p. 613-626
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005207170-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7101886256-
dc.description.lastpage626en_US
dc.description.firstpage613en_US
dc.relation.volume54en_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000316757000007-
dc.contributor.daisngid641205-
dc.contributor.daisngid597168-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDD-1139-2011-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDL-6377-2014-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Arana, JE-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Leon, CJ-
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2013en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr1,682
dc.description.jcr1,703
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.ssciSSCI
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado-
crisitem.author.deptGIR TIDES: Economía, medioambiente, sostenibilidad y turismo-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0878-9934-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9451-4093-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.fullNameAraña Padilla, Jorge-
crisitem.author.fullNameLeón González, Carmelo Javier-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

50
actualizado el 24-mar-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

41
actualizado el 25-feb-2024

Visitas

88
actualizado el 20-ene-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.