Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/50637
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorSilvestre, Juan F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMercader, Pedroen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Pérez, Ricardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorHervella-Garcés, Marcosen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanz-Sánchez, Tatianaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCórdoba, Susanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Pérez, Javieren_US
dc.contributor.authorHeras-Mendoza, Felipeen_US
dc.contributor.authorGiménez-Arnau, Ana M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGatica-Ortega, María E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPastor-NIeto, María A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZaragoza, Violetaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarrascosa, Jose M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Bravo, Begoñaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-González, Inmaculadaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBorrego, Leopoldoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Pedreño, Palomaen_US
dc.contributor.authorde Frutos, Javier O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArmario-Hita, Jose C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Gavín, Juanen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Redondo, Virginiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T17:38:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-24T17:38:56Z-
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.issn0105-1873en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/50637-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Fragrance chemicals constitute the second most frequent cause of contact allergy in Spain. There are no data available concerning the individual fragrances that are most frequently involved. Objectives: To describe the diagnostic contribution provided by specific fragrance series to the results obtained with baseline series fragrance markers by correlating the results of both series. Materials and methods: We performed a 5-year retrospective study of fragrance marker-positive patients tested with specific fragrance series in 23 Spanish centres. We collected the demographic and clinical characteristics, and compared the results of patch tests obtained from different suppliers. Results: Of 19 588 patients patch tested with the Spanish baseline series, 1590 (8.1%) reacted positively to a fragrance marker. Of these, 1013 (63.7%) were patch tested with a fragrance series, and 664 patients reacted positively to at least one individual fragrance other than hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. Geraniol was the most frequent allergen. Positive reactions to substances not included in fragrance mix (FM) I or FM II were found in 230 patients. Of the 436 FM I-positive patients and the 419 FM II-positive patients, 184 (42%) and 64 (39.1%), respectively, had no positive reactions to fragrance series. In the case of FM I, negative results were more common when individual fragrances were patch tested at low concentrations. Conclusions: We recommend patch testing all patients positive for any fragrance marker with a specific fragrance series. The correlation between the results of baseline series and fragrance series could be improved by increasing the concentrations of individual fragrances.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisher0105-1873
dc.relation.ispartofContact Dermatitisen_US
dc.sourceContact Dermatitis [ISSN 0105-1873], v. 8(2), p. 94-100en_US
dc.subject320106 Dermatologíaen_US
dc.subject.otherRRID:SCR_001905en_US
dc.subject.otherAllergic contact dermatitisen_US
dc.subject.otherEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherFragrancesen_US
dc.subject.otherPatch testen_US
dc.titleSensitization to fragrances in Spain: A 5-year multicentre study (2011-2015)en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cod.13152en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85056476927-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004500266-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56078517200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55909809000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6507817336-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506960206-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35569505100-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006076733-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57204631950-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24068420100-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57194638206-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid15128697400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506048812-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35548523800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55942951900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603455998-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004025265-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603701519-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003624916-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7801467610-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24502762200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003869944-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcNoen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,653
dc.description.jcr3,952
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0199-2756-
crisitem.author.fullNameBorrego Hernando, Leopoldo-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
actualizado el 14-jul-2024

Visitas

47
actualizado el 27-ene-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.