Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/50637
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSilvestre, Juan F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMercader, Pedroen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Pérez, Ricardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorHervella-Garcés, Marcosen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanz-Sánchez, Tatianaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCórdoba, Susanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Pérez, Javieren_US
dc.contributor.authorHeras-Mendoza, Felipeen_US
dc.contributor.authorGiménez-Arnau, Ana M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGatica-Ortega, María E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPastor-NIeto, María A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZaragoza, Violetaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarrascosa, Jose M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Bravo, Begoñaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-González, Inmaculadaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBorrego, Leopoldoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Pedreño, Palomaen_US
dc.contributor.authorde Frutos, Javier O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArmario-Hita, Jose C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Gavín, Juanen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Redondo, Virginiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T17:38:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-24T17:38:56Z-
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.issn0105-1873en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/50637-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Fragrance chemicals constitute the second most frequent cause of contact allergy in Spain. There are no data available concerning the individual fragrances that are most frequently involved. Objectives: To describe the diagnostic contribution provided by specific fragrance series to the results obtained with baseline series fragrance markers by correlating the results of both series. Materials and methods: We performed a 5-year retrospective study of fragrance marker-positive patients tested with specific fragrance series in 23 Spanish centres. We collected the demographic and clinical characteristics, and compared the results of patch tests obtained from different suppliers. Results: Of 19 588 patients patch tested with the Spanish baseline series, 1590 (8.1%) reacted positively to a fragrance marker. Of these, 1013 (63.7%) were patch tested with a fragrance series, and 664 patients reacted positively to at least one individual fragrance other than hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. Geraniol was the most frequent allergen. Positive reactions to substances not included in fragrance mix (FM) I or FM II were found in 230 patients. Of the 436 FM I-positive patients and the 419 FM II-positive patients, 184 (42%) and 64 (39.1%), respectively, had no positive reactions to fragrance series. In the case of FM I, negative results were more common when individual fragrances were patch tested at low concentrations. Conclusions: We recommend patch testing all patients positive for any fragrance marker with a specific fragrance series. The correlation between the results of baseline series and fragrance series could be improved by increasing the concentrations of individual fragrances.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisher0105-1873
dc.relation.ispartofContact Dermatitisen_US
dc.sourceContact Dermatitis [ISSN 0105-1873], v. 8(2), p. 94-100en_US
dc.subject320106 Dermatologíaen_US
dc.subject.otherRRID:SCR_001905en_US
dc.subject.otherAllergic contact dermatitisen_US
dc.subject.otherEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherFragrancesen_US
dc.subject.otherPatch testen_US
dc.titleSensitization to fragrances in Spain: A 5-year multicentre study (2011-2015)en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cod.13152en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85056476927-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004500266-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56078517200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55909809000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6507817336-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506960206-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35569505100-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006076733-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57204631950-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24068420100-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57194638206-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid15128697400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506048812-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35548523800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55942951900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603455998-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004025265-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603701519-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003624916-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7801467610-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24502762200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003869944-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcNoen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,653
dc.description.jcr3,952
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0199-2756-
crisitem.author.fullNameBorrego Hernando, Leopoldo-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on Jul 14, 2024

Page view(s)

47
checked on Jan 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.