Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/163421
Title: Mapping Interpersonal Meaning in Hannah Woolley’s Recipes and Manuals (1670-1672)
Other Titles: Cartografía del significado interpersonal en las recetas y manuales de Hannah Woolley (1670-1672)
Authors: Alonso Almeida, Francisco Jesús 
UNESCO Clasification: 5701 Lingüística aplicada
6202 Teoría, análisis y crítica literarias
630909 Posición social de la mujer
Keywords: Hannah Woolley
Interpersonal Meaning
Modality & Directives
Women’s Instructive Writing
Historical Pragmatics, et al
Issue Date: 2026
Project: Los Mecanismos Interpersonales en Los Textos Instructivos Especializados, Domésticosy No Domésticos, Escritos Por Mujeres en Inglés Moderno 
Journal: Revista canaria de estudios ingleses 
Abstract: This article analyses interpersonal markers in Hannah Woolley’s The Queen-like Closet (1670) and The Ladies Directory (1672), two of the earliest domestic manuals authored by an Englishwoman. Drawing on Systemic Functional Linguistics and Appraisal theory, it examines mood, modality, polarity, pronouns, conditionals, and graduation, combining quantitative frequencies with close exemplification. Results show that both works are grounded in imperatives, though Woolley tempers categorical directives with let-frames, permission modals, and hedges. Strong obligation markers (must, shall) dominate in 1670, while the later text shifts toward advisory forms (you may) and politeness hedges (if you please). Predictive will often functions as a promissory device, assuring readers of efficacy. The pervasive you casts the reader as active agent, while authorial I surfaces chiefly in evidential claims. These strategies reveal Woolley’s negotiation of female authority in print, where interpersonal resources both assert expertise and foster solidarity
El artículo examina los marcadores interpersonales en dos manuales domésticos de Hannah Woolley (1670, 1672) desde la Lingüística Sistémico-Funcional y la Appraisal Theory. El análisis muestra un predominio de imperativos atenuados mediante estructuras con let, modales de permiso y estrategias de cortesía. Entre ambas obras se observa una evolución desde una directividad más fuerte hacia fórmulas de consejo. El uso de will cumple una función promisoria, you sitúa al lector como agente y I construye autoridad basada en la experiencia.
URI: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/163421
ISSN: 0211-5913
DOI: 10.25145/j.recaesin.2026.92.13
Source: Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses [EISSN: 2530-8335], v. 92, p. 269-287 (Abril 2026)
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (887,24 kB)
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.