Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/154941
Título: Are Countermovement Jump Variables Indicators of Injury Risk in Professional Soccer Players? A Machine Learning Approach
Autores/as: Perez Contreras, Jorge Edmundo 
Villaseca-Vicuna, Rodrigo
Loro Ferrer, Juan Francisco 
Inostroza-Rios, Felipe
Brito, Ciro Jose
Cerda-Kohler, Hugo
Bustamante-Garrido, Alejandro
Munoz-Hinrichsen, Fernando
Hermosilla Palma, Felipe Andrés 
Ulloa-Diaz, David
Merino-Munoz, Pablo
Aedo-Munoz, Esteban
Clasificación UNESCO: 2411 Fisiología humana
Palabras clave: Elite Male
Muscle Injuries
Football
Performance
Prediction, et al.
Fecha de publicación: 2025
Publicación seriada: Applied Sciences 
Resumen: Background: Muscle injuries are among the main problems in professional soccer, affecting player availability and team performance. Countermovement jump (CMJ) variables have been proposed as indicators of injury risk and for detecting strength imbalances, although their use is less explored than isokinetic assessments. Unlike previous studies based solely on linear statistics, this research integrates biomechanical data with machine learning approaches, providing a novel perspective for injury prediction in elite soccer. Objective: To examine the association between CMJ variables and muscle injury risk during a competitive season, considering injury incidence and effective playing minutes. It was hypothesized that specific CMJ asymmetries would be associated with a higher injury risk, and that machine learning algorithms could accurately classify players according to their injury status. Methods: Forty-one professional soccer players (18 women, 23 men) from national league teams (Chile) were assessed during preseason using force platforms. Non-contact muscle injuries and playing minutes were recorded over 10 months after the CMJ evaluations. Analyses included two-way ANOVA (sex x injury status) and machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors [KNN], Random Forest, Gradient Boosting [GB]). Results: Significant sex differences were observed in most variables (p < 0.05 and eta(2)(p) > 0.11), except peak force and peak power asymmetry. For injury status, only peak force asymmetry differed, while sex x injury interactions were found in peak power and left peak power. KNN (Accuracy = 87% and CI 95% = 71% to 96%) and GB (Accuracy = 84% and CI 95% = 68% to 94%) achieved the best classification performance between injured and non-injured players. Conclusions: CMJ did not show consistent statistical differences between injured and non-injured groups. However, machine learning models, particularly KNN and GB, demonstrated high predictive accuracy, suggesting that injuries are a complex phenomenon characterized by non-linear patterns. These findings highlight the potential of combining CMJ with machine learning approaches for functional monitoring and early detection of injury risk, though validation in larger cohorts is required before establishing clinical thresholds and preventive applications.
URI: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/154941
ISSN: 2076-3417
DOI: 10.3390/app152312721
Fuente: Applied Sciences [eISSN 2076-3417],v. 15 (23), (Diciembre 2025)
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (498,2 kB)
Vista completa

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.