Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/124267
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorDorta González, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.authorDorta González,María Isabelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T11:54:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-04T11:54:38Z-
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-1333en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/124267-
dc.description.abstractThis research provides insight into the complex relationship between open access, funding, and citation advantage. It presents an analysis of research articles and their citations in the Scopus database across 40 subject categories. The sample includes 12 categories from Health Sciences, 7 from Life Sciences, 10 from Physical Sciences & Engineering, and 11 from Social Sciences & Humanities. Specifically, the analysis focuses on articles published in 2016 and the citations they received from 2016 to 2020. Our findings show that open access articles published in hybrid journals receive considerably more citations than those published in gold open access journals. Articles under the hybrid gold modality are cited on average twice as much as those in the gold modality, regardless of funding. Furthermore, we found that funded articles generally obtain 50 % more citations than unfunded ones within the same publication modality. Open access repositories significantly increase citations, particularly for articles without funding. Thus, articles in open access repositories receive 50 % more citations than paywalled ones.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Academic Librarianshipen_US
dc.sourceThe Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(4), 102734.en_US
dc.subject570106 Documentaciónen_US
dc.subject.otherCitation advantageen_US
dc.subject.otherOpen accessen_US
dc.subject.otherFunded researchen_US
dc.subject.otherGold OAen_US
dc.subject.otherGreen OAen_US
dc.subject.otherHybrid OAen_US
dc.titleCitation differences across research funding and access modalitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102734en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85159616789-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001001561700001-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0494-2903-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicasen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-ECOen_US
dc.description.sjr0,858
dc.description.jcr2,6
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ3
dc.description.ssciSSCI
dc.description.miaricds11,0
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR TIDES- Técnicas estadísticas bayesianas y de decisión en la economía y empresa-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Métodos Cuantitativos en Economía y Gestión-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0494-2903-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.fullNameDorta González, Pablo-
crisitem.author.fullNameDorta González,María Isabel-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (511,94 kB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.