Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/124267
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDorta González, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.authorDorta González,María Isabelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T11:54:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-04T11:54:38Z-
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-1333en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/124267-
dc.description.abstractThis research provides insight into the complex relationship between open access, funding, and citation advantage. It presents an analysis of research articles and their citations in the Scopus database across 40 subject categories. The sample includes 12 categories from Health Sciences, 7 from Life Sciences, 10 from Physical Sciences & Engineering, and 11 from Social Sciences & Humanities. Specifically, the analysis focuses on articles published in 2016 and the citations they received from 2016 to 2020. Our findings show that open access articles published in hybrid journals receive considerably more citations than those published in gold open access journals. Articles under the hybrid gold modality are cited on average twice as much as those in the gold modality, regardless of funding. Furthermore, we found that funded articles generally obtain 50 % more citations than unfunded ones within the same publication modality. Open access repositories significantly increase citations, particularly for articles without funding. Thus, articles in open access repositories receive 50 % more citations than paywalled ones.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Academic Librarianshipen_US
dc.sourceThe Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(4), 102734.en_US
dc.subject570106 Documentaciónen_US
dc.subject.otherCitation advantageen_US
dc.subject.otherOpen accessen_US
dc.subject.otherFunded researchen_US
dc.subject.otherGold OAen_US
dc.subject.otherGreen OAen_US
dc.subject.otherHybrid OAen_US
dc.titleCitation differences across research funding and access modalitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102734en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85159616789-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001001561700001-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0494-2903-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicasen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-ECOen_US
dc.description.sjr0,858
dc.description.jcr2,6
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ3
dc.description.ssciSSCI
dc.description.miaricds11,0
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR TIDES- Técnicas estadísticas bayesianas y de decisión en la economía y empresa-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Métodos Cuantitativos en Economía y Gestión-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0494-2903-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.fullNameDorta González, Pablo-
crisitem.author.fullNameDorta González,María Isabel-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (511,94 kB)
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Nov 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Nov 17, 2024

Page view(s)

117
checked on Oct 31, 2024

Download(s)

89
checked on Oct 31, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.