Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/124224
Campo DC | Valor | idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Molina Mazón, C. S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Serrano, M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Luque, L. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Armas, C. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mòdol, M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Endrényi, S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Luque, M. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-31T14:54:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-31T14:54:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1749-7701 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/124224 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The aims of this study are to simulate the insertion of the new T-Control® urinary catheter with experienced healthcare professionals in bladder catheterisation and evaluate the usability and functionality of the new catheter compared to conventional Foley-type catheter open and closed systems. A small-scale quantitative study was conducted with 11 professionals who had a minimum of 3 years of professional experience, and 1 year of experience in bladder catheterisation. To test the advantages of the new T-Control® urinary catheter, a Living Lab, which is an instrument designed to test innovative solutions in real-life environments with users, was performed. The catheters used in the simulation were: a conventional Foley-type catheter in an open system, a conventional Foley-type catheter in a closed system, and the new T-Control® catheter. The participants evaluated the insertions through a satisfaction questionnaire and by a nurse expert utilizing a usability questionnaire after the complete visualization of the Living Lab was recorded. T-Control® reduced by 27.3% the contamination of the urine collection bag and the contamination of the urine collection bag connector. Accidental spillages when connecting the urine collection bag were also reduced by 54.5% using the T-Control® catheter, reducing the workload and reducing occupational accidents before connecting the urine bag. The trainer considered satisfactory 9/12 T-Control® insertions performed, improving the number of satisfactory insertions observed with the Foley-type catheter open and closed systems (with 3/12 and 7/12 results respectively). T-Control® was the best-rated product by the participants, requiring less time, and physical and mental effort. Fifty percent of the nurses would exclusively recommend T-Control® in their units, while the other half would recommend it in combination with others. The insertion of T-Control® makes the bladder catheterisation procedure easier and safer. The preparation of the sterile field requires less material since it does not include the urine collection bag while the fluid-controlling system favours the reduction of contamination and accidental spillages. Based on the nurses’ evaluation, T-Control® with its integrated urine-controlling system could bring additional benefits to the healthcare staff for catheterisation. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Urological Nursing | en_US |
dc.source | International Journal of Urological Nursing [ISSN 1749-7701], (Junio 2023) | en_US |
dc.subject | 32 Ciencias médicas | en_US |
dc.subject | 321316 Urología | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Bladder Isation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Catheter | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Catheter | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Foley | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Living Lab | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Simulation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | T-Control® | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluating possible improvements in indwelling urinary catheter insertion from nurses' point of view: A pilot comparative study of simulated insertion between the novel T-Control® and a Foley-type catheter | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/Article | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ijun.12372 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 85164370948 | - |
dc.contributor.orcid | NO DATA | - |
dc.contributor.orcid | NO DATA | - |
dc.contributor.orcid | NO DATA | - |
dc.contributor.orcid | NO DATA | - |
dc.contributor.orcid | NO DATA | - |
dc.contributor.orcid | NO DATA | - |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0009-0003-3804-2978 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 57201395710 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 58157539300 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 58480041100 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 58157192500 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 58480417500 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 58155103400 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 58156768100 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1749-771X | - |
dc.investigacion | Ciencias de la Salud | en_US |
dc.type2 | Artículo | en_US |
dc.description.numberofpages | 10 | en_US |
dc.utils.revision | Sí | en_US |
dc.date.coverdate | Junio 2023 | en_US |
dc.identifier.ulpgc | No | en_US |
dc.contributor.buulpgc | BU-MED | en_US |
dc.description.sjr | 0,167 | |
dc.description.sjrq | Q4 | |
dc.description.miaricds | 7,6 | |
item.fulltext | Sin texto completo | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
Colección: | Artículos |
Citas SCOPUSTM
2
actualizado el 29-dic-2024
Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
1
actualizado el 29-dic-2024
Visitas
69
actualizado el 31-oct-2024
Google ScholarTM
Verifica
Altmetric
Comparte
Exporta metadatos
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.