Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/124224
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorMolina Mazón, C. S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLuque, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArmas, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMòdol, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEndrényi, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLuque, M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-31T14:54:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-31T14:54:15Z-
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749-7701en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/124224-
dc.description.abstractThe aims of this study are to simulate the insertion of the new T-Control® urinary catheter with experienced healthcare professionals in bladder catheterisation and evaluate the usability and functionality of the new catheter compared to conventional Foley-type catheter open and closed systems. A small-scale quantitative study was conducted with 11 professionals who had a minimum of 3 years of professional experience, and 1 year of experience in bladder catheterisation. To test the advantages of the new T-Control® urinary catheter, a Living Lab, which is an instrument designed to test innovative solutions in real-life environments with users, was performed. The catheters used in the simulation were: a conventional Foley-type catheter in an open system, a conventional Foley-type catheter in a closed system, and the new T-Control® catheter. The participants evaluated the insertions through a satisfaction questionnaire and by a nurse expert utilizing a usability questionnaire after the complete visualization of the Living Lab was recorded. T-Control® reduced by 27.3% the contamination of the urine collection bag and the contamination of the urine collection bag connector. Accidental spillages when connecting the urine collection bag were also reduced by 54.5% using the T-Control® catheter, reducing the workload and reducing occupational accidents before connecting the urine bag. The trainer considered satisfactory 9/12 T-Control® insertions performed, improving the number of satisfactory insertions observed with the Foley-type catheter open and closed systems (with 3/12 and 7/12 results respectively). T-Control® was the best-rated product by the participants, requiring less time, and physical and mental effort. Fifty percent of the nurses would exclusively recommend T-Control® in their units, while the other half would recommend it in combination with others. The insertion of T-Control® makes the bladder catheterisation procedure easier and safer. The preparation of the sterile field requires less material since it does not include the urine collection bag while the fluid-controlling system favours the reduction of contamination and accidental spillages. Based on the nurses’ evaluation, T-Control® with its integrated urine-controlling system could bring additional benefits to the healthcare staff for catheterisation.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Urological Nursingen_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Urological Nursing [ISSN 1749-7701], (Junio 2023)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject321316 Urologíaen_US
dc.subject.otherBladder Isationen_US
dc.subject.otherCatheteren_US
dc.subject.otherCatheteren_US
dc.subject.otherFoleyen_US
dc.subject.otherLiving Laben_US
dc.subject.otherSimulationen_US
dc.subject.otherT-Control®en_US
dc.titleEvaluating possible improvements in indwelling urinary catheter insertion from nurses' point of view: A pilot comparative study of simulated insertion between the novel T-Control® and a Foley-type catheteren_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijun.12372en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85164370948-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcid0009-0003-3804-2978-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57201395710-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58157539300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58480041100-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58157192500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58480417500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58155103400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58156768100-
dc.identifier.eissn1749-771X-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages10en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateJunio 2023en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcNoen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,167
dc.description.sjrqQ4
dc.description.miaricds7,6
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.