Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/124224
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMolina Mazón, C. S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLuque, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArmas, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMòdol, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEndrényi, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLuque, M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-31T14:54:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-31T14:54:15Z-
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749-7701en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/124224-
dc.description.abstractThe aims of this study are to simulate the insertion of the new T-Control® urinary catheter with experienced healthcare professionals in bladder catheterisation and evaluate the usability and functionality of the new catheter compared to conventional Foley-type catheter open and closed systems. A small-scale quantitative study was conducted with 11 professionals who had a minimum of 3 years of professional experience, and 1 year of experience in bladder catheterisation. To test the advantages of the new T-Control® urinary catheter, a Living Lab, which is an instrument designed to test innovative solutions in real-life environments with users, was performed. The catheters used in the simulation were: a conventional Foley-type catheter in an open system, a conventional Foley-type catheter in a closed system, and the new T-Control® catheter. The participants evaluated the insertions through a satisfaction questionnaire and by a nurse expert utilizing a usability questionnaire after the complete visualization of the Living Lab was recorded. T-Control® reduced by 27.3% the contamination of the urine collection bag and the contamination of the urine collection bag connector. Accidental spillages when connecting the urine collection bag were also reduced by 54.5% using the T-Control® catheter, reducing the workload and reducing occupational accidents before connecting the urine bag. The trainer considered satisfactory 9/12 T-Control® insertions performed, improving the number of satisfactory insertions observed with the Foley-type catheter open and closed systems (with 3/12 and 7/12 results respectively). T-Control® was the best-rated product by the participants, requiring less time, and physical and mental effort. Fifty percent of the nurses would exclusively recommend T-Control® in their units, while the other half would recommend it in combination with others. The insertion of T-Control® makes the bladder catheterisation procedure easier and safer. The preparation of the sterile field requires less material since it does not include the urine collection bag while the fluid-controlling system favours the reduction of contamination and accidental spillages. Based on the nurses’ evaluation, T-Control® with its integrated urine-controlling system could bring additional benefits to the healthcare staff for catheterisation.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Urological Nursingen_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Urological Nursing [ISSN 1749-7701], (Junio 2023)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject321316 Urologíaen_US
dc.subject.otherBladder Isationen_US
dc.subject.otherCatheteren_US
dc.subject.otherCatheteren_US
dc.subject.otherFoleyen_US
dc.subject.otherLiving Laben_US
dc.subject.otherSimulationen_US
dc.subject.otherT-Control®en_US
dc.titleEvaluating possible improvements in indwelling urinary catheter insertion from nurses' point of view: A pilot comparative study of simulated insertion between the novel T-Control® and a Foley-type catheteren_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijun.12372en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85164370948-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcid0009-0003-3804-2978-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57201395710-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58157539300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58480041100-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58157192500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58480417500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58155103400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid58156768100-
dc.identifier.eissn1749-771X-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages10en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateJunio 2023en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcNoen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,167
dc.description.sjrqQ4
dc.description.miaricds7,6
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Mar 30, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Mar 30, 2025

Page view(s)

69
checked on Oct 31, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.