Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/120786
Título: Daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine and hydroxychloroquine for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial in healthcare workers
Autores/as: Polo, Rosa
García-Albéniz, Xabier
Terán, Carolina
Morales, Miguel
Rial-Crestelo, David
Garcinuño, M. Angeles
García del Toro, Miguel
Hita, César
Gómez-Sirvent, Juan Luis
Buzón, Luis
Díaz de Santiago, Alberto
Pérez Arellano, José Luis 
Sanz, Jesus
Bachiller, Pablo
Alfaro, Elisa Martínez
Díaz-Brito, Vicente
Masiá, Mar
Hernández-Torres, Alicia
Guerra, Jose M.
Santos, Jesús
Arazo, Piedad
Muñoz, Leopoldo
Arribas, Jose Ramon
Martínez de Salazar, Pablo
Moreno, Santiago
Hernán, Miguel A.
Del Amo, Julia
Julia del Amo
Berenguer, Juan
Martínez, Esteban
Hernán, Miguel
García de Albéniz, Xabier
Clasificación UNESCO: 32 Ciencias médicas
320103 Microbiología clínica
Palabras clave: COVID-19
Pre-exposure prophylaxis
Randomized clinical trial
SARS-CoV-2
Tenofovir
Fecha de publicación: 2023
Publicación seriada: Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
Resumen: Objectives: To assess the effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) as pre-exposure prophylaxis on COVID-19 risk. Methods: EPICOS is a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial conducted in Spain, Bolivia, and Venezuela. Healthcare workers with negative SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG test were randomly assigned to the following: daily TDF/FTC plus HCQ for 12 weeks, TDF/FTC plus HCQ placebo, HCQ plus TDF/FTC placebo, and TDF/FTC placebo plus HCQ placebo. Randomization was performed in groups of four. Primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed, symptomatic COVID-19. We also studied any (symptomatic or asymptomatic) COVID-19. We compared group-specific 14-week risks via differences and ratios with 95% CIs. Results: Of 1002 individuals screened, 926 (92.4%) were eligible and there were 14 cases of symptomatic COVID-19: 220 were assigned to the TDF/FTC plus HCQ group (3 cases), 231 to the TDF/FTC placebo plus HCQ group (3 cases), 233 to the TDF/FTC plus HCQ placebo group (3 cases), and 223 to the double placebo group (5 cases). Compared with the double placebo group, 14-week risk ratios (95% CI) of symptomatic COVID-19 were 0.39 (0.00–1.98) for TDF + HCQ, 0.34 (0.00–2.06) for TDF, and 0.49 (0.00–2.29) for HCQ. Corresponding risk ratios of any COVID-19 were 0.51 (0.21–1.00) for TDF + HCQ, 0.81 (0.44–1.49) for TDF, and 0.73 (0.41–1.38) for HCQ. Adverse events were generally mild. Discussion: The target sample size was not met. Our findings are compatible with both benefit and harm of pre-exposure prophylaxis with TDF/FTC and HCQ, alone or in combination, compared with placebo.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/120786
ISSN: 1198-743X
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.006
Fuente: Clinical Microbiology and Infection [ISSN 1198-743X], v. 29 (1), p. 85-93, (Enero 2023)
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,16 MB)
Vista completa

Citas SCOPUSTM   

8
actualizado el 24-nov-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
actualizado el 24-nov-2024

Visitas

86
actualizado el 30-nov-2024

Descargas

68
actualizado el 30-nov-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.