Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/120786
Title: Daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine and hydroxychloroquine for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial in healthcare workers
Authors: Polo, Rosa
García-Albéniz, Xabier
Terán, Carolina
Morales, Miguel
Rial-Crestelo, David
Garcinuño, M. Angeles
García del Toro, Miguel
Hita, César
Gómez-Sirvent, Juan Luis
Buzón, Luis
Díaz de Santiago, Alberto
Pérez Arellano, José Luis 
Sanz, Jesus
Bachiller, Pablo
Alfaro, Elisa Martínez
Díaz-Brito, Vicente
Masiá, Mar
Hernández-Torres, Alicia
Guerra, Jose M.
Santos, Jesús
Arazo, Piedad
Muñoz, Leopoldo
Arribas, Jose Ramon
Martínez de Salazar, Pablo
Moreno, Santiago
Hernán, Miguel A.
Del Amo, Julia
Julia del Amo
Berenguer, Juan
Martínez, Esteban
Hernán, Miguel
García de Albéniz, Xabier
UNESCO Clasification: 32 Ciencias médicas
320103 Microbiología clínica
Keywords: COVID-19
Pre-exposure prophylaxis
Randomized clinical trial
SARS-CoV-2
Tenofovir
Issue Date: 2023
Journal: Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
Abstract: Objectives: To assess the effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) as pre-exposure prophylaxis on COVID-19 risk. Methods: EPICOS is a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial conducted in Spain, Bolivia, and Venezuela. Healthcare workers with negative SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG test were randomly assigned to the following: daily TDF/FTC plus HCQ for 12 weeks, TDF/FTC plus HCQ placebo, HCQ plus TDF/FTC placebo, and TDF/FTC placebo plus HCQ placebo. Randomization was performed in groups of four. Primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed, symptomatic COVID-19. We also studied any (symptomatic or asymptomatic) COVID-19. We compared group-specific 14-week risks via differences and ratios with 95% CIs. Results: Of 1002 individuals screened, 926 (92.4%) were eligible and there were 14 cases of symptomatic COVID-19: 220 were assigned to the TDF/FTC plus HCQ group (3 cases), 231 to the TDF/FTC placebo plus HCQ group (3 cases), 233 to the TDF/FTC plus HCQ placebo group (3 cases), and 223 to the double placebo group (5 cases). Compared with the double placebo group, 14-week risk ratios (95% CI) of symptomatic COVID-19 were 0.39 (0.00–1.98) for TDF + HCQ, 0.34 (0.00–2.06) for TDF, and 0.49 (0.00–2.29) for HCQ. Corresponding risk ratios of any COVID-19 were 0.51 (0.21–1.00) for TDF + HCQ, 0.81 (0.44–1.49) for TDF, and 0.73 (0.41–1.38) for HCQ. Adverse events were generally mild. Discussion: The target sample size was not met. Our findings are compatible with both benefit and harm of pre-exposure prophylaxis with TDF/FTC and HCQ, alone or in combination, compared with placebo.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/120786
ISSN: 1198-743X
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.006
Source: Clinical Microbiology and Infection [ISSN 1198-743X], v. 29 (1), p. 85-93, (Enero 2023)
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,16 MB)
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Nov 24, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Page view(s)

86
checked on Nov 30, 2024

Download(s)

68
checked on Nov 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.