Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/114793
Título: Antifouling booster biocides in sea mullet (Mugil Cephalus) sampled in harbours of Gran Canaria Island (Canary Islands)
Autores/as: Franco Barrios, Alejandro
Torres Padrón, María Esther 
Sosa Ferrera, Zoraida 
Santana Rodríguez, José Juan 
Clasificación UNESCO: 2510 Oceanografía
251001 Oceanografía biológica
251002 Oceanografía química
330811 Control de la contaminación del agua
331912 Construcción naval
Fecha de publicación: 2014
Conferencia: IV Congress of Marine Sciences 
Resumen: Biofouling is a problem for any structure placed in the aquatic environment that it can be controlled through chemical biocides like antifouling paints. According to the Biocides Directive (98/8/EC), biocides are active substances or preparations that are intended to destroy, deter, render harmless and exert control or prevent the action of any other harmful organism through chemical or biological means. The widely use of booster biocides in antifouling paints represents an important source of pollution to the marine environment and the transfer of these toxic pollutants to the higher trophic levels is a topic of major concern. This work present the monitorization of two booster biocides commonly employed, Irgarol 1051 and Diuron, in samples of muscle and liver tissues of Mugil cephalus. The proposed sentinel organism could be used in tropical and subtropical regions for a continuous biomonitoring of booster biocides during long time of periods. This could be a useful tool to improve the ocean and coastal management. Samples were collected bimonthly in different harbours of Gran Canaria island (Muelle Deportivo de Las Palmas and Puerto de Moga´n) and processed using a previously optimized method based on a microwave assisted extraction followed by solid phase extraction as preconcentration and clean-up step (MAE-SPE) coupled with liquid chromatography-tanden mass espectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Highest levels of Irgarol (6,9±1,03 ng g−1) were found in the liver, whereas Diuron was not detected in this tissue. However, Diuron was found in muscle (1,41 ± 0,45 ng g−1).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/114793
ISBN: 84-697-0471-0
Fuente: Book of Abstracts submitted to the IV Congress of Marine Sciences. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, June 11th to 13th 2014, p. 125
Colección:Actas de congresos
Adobe PDF (108,36 kB)
Vista completa

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.