For (a) theory (of architecture)

Abstract

If theory means a series of rules for interpretation and action, which aspire to the explanation and comprehension of reality, we are now living in a situation where theory is not a priority concern, and in the case of architecture probably because theory is also a way of questioning it. As we know, reality is built by theory, but to this a certain distance and time is necessary that active practice does not permit: the quiet contemplation which theoria needs is not at present on architects' agenda, thus depriving it of its political task. But is it not necessary to justify architectural decisions, to transmit them, to share a common language? Is it not necessary, in the midst of incomprehensible verbiage, to look for a coherence, to build up knowledge about architecture? The purpose of this paper is to remember and to recall the role played by theory in architectural thought.(1)