Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/159589
Título: Preoperative Imaging for Cochlear Implantation: A Global Consensus
Autores/as: Alzhrani, Farid
Alahmadi, Asma
Alshalan, Afrah
Abdelsamad, Yassin
Alsanosi, Abdulrahman
Acharya, Aanand
Kim, Ana H.
Ramos Macías, Ángel Manuel 
Gantz, Bruce
Buchman, Craig
Jiang, Dan
Cuda, Domenico
Jankunaite, Dovile
Sprinzl, Georg
Olze, Heidi
Anderson, Ilona
Shami, Ibrahim
Saunders, James E.
Gavilan, Javier
Kutz, Walter
Brown, Kevin D.
Rak, Kristen
Telmesani, Laila
Lassaletta, Luis
Bance, Manohar
Caversaccio, Marco
Kameswaran, Mohan
Zernotti, Mario
Verhaert, Nicolas
Adunka, Oliver
Connolly, Patrick F.
Van De Heyning, Paul
Caye-thomasen, Per
Skarzynski, Piotr
Briggs, Robert
Hagen, Rudolf
Khalil, Sherif
Ghossaini, Soha N.
Plontke, Stefan K.
O'leary, Stephen J.
Agrawal, Sumit K.
Yamasoba, Tatsuya
Lenarz, Thomas
Stover, Timo
Topsakal, Vedat
Van Rompaey, Vincent
Hagr, Abdulrahman
Clasificación UNESCO: 32 Ciencias médicas
3213 Cirugía
Palabras clave: Computed-Tomography
Adult
Children
Sedation
Outcomes, et al.
Fecha de publicación: 2026
Publicación seriada: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 
Resumen: Objective. Preoperative imaging is vital for cochlear implant surgeries, aiding diagnosis, and surgical planning. This study evaluated global practices and the value of preoperative imaging through an international survey. Methods. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among international cochlear implantation experts using a 112-item questionnaire. The study explored imaging modalities, anatomical targets, evaluated parameters, and different imaging approaches' perceived value and risks. Participants were recruited from a global consortium of otolaryngology, otology, neurotology, and cochlear implant surgery professionals. Results. Thirty-nine practitioners from 36 centers in 16 countries completed the survey (95.1% response rate). All used computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative evaluation; MRI was deemed more valuable for diagnosis and candidacy assessment, while CT was preferred for surgical planning. Nearly half utilized additional imaging modalities, with functional MRI being the most common (20.5%). Additionally, 79.5% of respondents reported using image-based surgical planning software. Discussion. Results show a universal reliance on CT and MRI for cochlear implant evaluations, with MRI aiding diagnosis and CT focusing on surgical planning. Advanced imaging techniques may emerge in specific clinical cases. Implications for practice. Modern imaging practices and their potential changes can enhance protocol development and improve preoperative evaluations, ultimately boosting patient safety and outcomes in cochlear implantation.
URI: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/159589
ISSN: 0194-5998
DOI: 10.1002/ohn.1361
Fuente: Otolaryngology-Head And Neck Surgery [ISSN 0194-5998], (Febrero 2026)
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,73 MB)
Vista completa

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.