Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/159589
| Título: | Preoperative Imaging for Cochlear Implantation: A Global Consensus | Autores/as: | Alzhrani, Farid Alahmadi, Asma Alshalan, Afrah Abdelsamad, Yassin Alsanosi, Abdulrahman Acharya, Aanand Kim, Ana H. Ramos Macías, Ángel Manuel Gantz, Bruce Buchman, Craig Jiang, Dan Cuda, Domenico Jankunaite, Dovile Sprinzl, Georg Olze, Heidi Anderson, Ilona Shami, Ibrahim Saunders, James E. Gavilan, Javier Kutz, Walter Brown, Kevin D. Rak, Kristen Telmesani, Laila Lassaletta, Luis Bance, Manohar Caversaccio, Marco Kameswaran, Mohan Zernotti, Mario Verhaert, Nicolas Adunka, Oliver Connolly, Patrick F. Van De Heyning, Paul Caye-thomasen, Per Skarzynski, Piotr Briggs, Robert Hagen, Rudolf Khalil, Sherif Ghossaini, Soha N. Plontke, Stefan K. O'leary, Stephen J. Agrawal, Sumit K. Yamasoba, Tatsuya Lenarz, Thomas Stover, Timo Topsakal, Vedat Van Rompaey, Vincent Hagr, Abdulrahman |
Clasificación UNESCO: | 32 Ciencias médicas 3213 Cirugía |
Palabras clave: | Computed-Tomography Adult Children Sedation Outcomes, et al. |
Fecha de publicación: | 2026 | Publicación seriada: | Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery | Resumen: | Objective. Preoperative imaging is vital for cochlear implant surgeries, aiding diagnosis, and surgical planning. This study evaluated global practices and the value of preoperative imaging through an international survey. Methods. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among international cochlear implantation experts using a 112-item questionnaire. The study explored imaging modalities, anatomical targets, evaluated parameters, and different imaging approaches' perceived value and risks. Participants were recruited from a global consortium of otolaryngology, otology, neurotology, and cochlear implant surgery professionals. Results. Thirty-nine practitioners from 36 centers in 16 countries completed the survey (95.1% response rate). All used computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative evaluation; MRI was deemed more valuable for diagnosis and candidacy assessment, while CT was preferred for surgical planning. Nearly half utilized additional imaging modalities, with functional MRI being the most common (20.5%). Additionally, 79.5% of respondents reported using image-based surgical planning software. Discussion. Results show a universal reliance on CT and MRI for cochlear implant evaluations, with MRI aiding diagnosis and CT focusing on surgical planning. Advanced imaging techniques may emerge in specific clinical cases. Implications for practice. Modern imaging practices and their potential changes can enhance protocol development and improve preoperative evaluations, ultimately boosting patient safety and outcomes in cochlear implantation. | URI: | https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/159589 | ISSN: | 0194-5998 | DOI: | 10.1002/ohn.1361 | Fuente: | Otolaryngology-Head And Neck Surgery [ISSN 0194-5998], (Febrero 2026) |
| Colección: | Artículos |
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.