Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/134675
Título: | International Consensus Statements on Intraoperative Testing for Cochlear Implantation Surgery | Autores/as: | Alzhrani, Farid Aljazeeri, Isra Abdelsamad, Yassin Alsanosi, Abdulrahman Kim, Ana H. Ramos Macías, Ángel Manuel Ramos De Miguel, Ángel Kurz, Anja Lorens, Artur Gantz, Bruce Buchman, Craig A. Tavora-Vieira, Dayse Sprinzl, Georg Mertens, Griet Saunders, James E. Kosaner, Julie Telmesani, Laila M. Lassaletta, Luis Bance, Manohar Yousef, Medhat Holcomb, Meredith A. Adunka, Oliver Thomasen, Per Caye- Skarzynski, Piotr H. Rajeswaran, Ranjith Briggs, Robert J. Oh, Seung-Ha Plontke, Stefan O'Leary, Stephen J. Agrawal, Sumit Yamasoba, Tatsuya Lenarz, Thomas Wesarg, Thomas Kutz, Walter Connolly, Patrick Anderson, Ilona Hagr, Abdulrahman |
Clasificación UNESCO: | 32 Ciencias médicas 3213 Cirugía |
Palabras clave: | Brain-Stem Responses Intracochlear Test Electrode Tip Fold-Over Postoperative Assessment Computed-Tomography, et al. |
Fecha de publicación: | 2024 | Publicación seriada: | Ear and Hearing | Resumen: | Objectives:A wide variety of intraoperative tests are available in cochlear implantation. However, no consensus exists on which tests constitute the minimum necessary battery. We assembled an international panel of clinical experts to develop, refine, and vote upon a set of core consensus statements.Design:A literature review was used to identify intraoperative tests currently used in the field and draft a set of provisional statements. For statement evaluation and refinement, we used a modified Delphi consensus panel structure. Multiple interactive rounds of voting, evaluation, and feedback were conducted to achieve convergence.Results:Twenty-nine provisional statements were included in the original draft. In the first voting round, consensus was reached on 15 statements. Of the 14 statements that did not reach consensus, 12 were revised based on feedback provided by the expert practitioners, and 2 were eliminated. In the second voting round, 10 of the 12 revised statements reached a consensus. The two statements which did not achieve consensus were further revised and subjected to a third voting round. However, both statements failed to achieve consensus in the third round. In addition, during the final revision, one more statement was decided to be deleted due to overlap with another modified statement.Conclusions:A final core set of 24 consensus statements was generated, covering wide areas of intraoperative testing during CI surgery. These statements may provide utility as evidence-based guidelines to improve quality and achieve uniformity of surgical practice. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/134675 | ISSN: | 0196-0202 | DOI: | 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001526 | Fuente: | Ear And Hearing[ISSN 0196-0202],v. 45 (6), p. 1418-1426, (Noviembre-Diciembre 2024) |
Colección: | Artículos |
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.