Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/134675
Título: International Consensus Statements on Intraoperative Testing for Cochlear Implantation Surgery
Autores/as: Alzhrani, Farid
Aljazeeri, Isra
Abdelsamad, Yassin
Alsanosi, Abdulrahman
Kim, Ana H.
Ramos Macías, Ángel Manuel 
Ramos De Miguel, Ángel 
Kurz, Anja
Lorens, Artur
Gantz, Bruce
Buchman, Craig A.
Tavora-Vieira, Dayse
Sprinzl, Georg
Mertens, Griet
Saunders, James E.
Kosaner, Julie
Telmesani, Laila M.
Lassaletta, Luis
Bance, Manohar
Yousef, Medhat
Holcomb, Meredith A.
Adunka, Oliver
Thomasen, Per Caye-
Skarzynski, Piotr H.
Rajeswaran, Ranjith
Briggs, Robert J.
Oh, Seung-Ha
Plontke, Stefan
O'Leary, Stephen J.
Agrawal, Sumit
Yamasoba, Tatsuya
Lenarz, Thomas
Wesarg, Thomas
Kutz, Walter
Connolly, Patrick
Anderson, Ilona
Hagr, Abdulrahman
Clasificación UNESCO: 32 Ciencias médicas
3213 Cirugía
Palabras clave: Brain-Stem Responses
Intracochlear Test Electrode
Tip Fold-Over
Postoperative Assessment
Computed-Tomography, et al.
Fecha de publicación: 2024
Publicación seriada: Ear and Hearing 
Resumen: Objectives:A wide variety of intraoperative tests are available in cochlear implantation. However, no consensus exists on which tests constitute the minimum necessary battery. We assembled an international panel of clinical experts to develop, refine, and vote upon a set of core consensus statements.Design:A literature review was used to identify intraoperative tests currently used in the field and draft a set of provisional statements. For statement evaluation and refinement, we used a modified Delphi consensus panel structure. Multiple interactive rounds of voting, evaluation, and feedback were conducted to achieve convergence.Results:Twenty-nine provisional statements were included in the original draft. In the first voting round, consensus was reached on 15 statements. Of the 14 statements that did not reach consensus, 12 were revised based on feedback provided by the expert practitioners, and 2 were eliminated. In the second voting round, 10 of the 12 revised statements reached a consensus. The two statements which did not achieve consensus were further revised and subjected to a third voting round. However, both statements failed to achieve consensus in the third round. In addition, during the final revision, one more statement was decided to be deleted due to overlap with another modified statement.Conclusions:A final core set of 24 consensus statements was generated, covering wide areas of intraoperative testing during CI surgery. These statements may provide utility as evidence-based guidelines to improve quality and achieve uniformity of surgical practice.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/134675
ISSN: 0196-0202
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001526
Fuente: Ear And Hearing[ISSN 0196-0202],v. 45 (6), p. 1418-1426, (Noviembre-Diciembre 2024)
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (500,31 kB)
Vista completa

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.