Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/133302
Título: Withdrawal/Withholding of Life-Sustaining Therapies: Limitation of Therapeutic Effort in the Intensive Care Unit
Autores/as: Becerra Bolaños, Ángel 
Ramos-Ahumada, Daniela F.
Herrera-Rodríguez, Lorena
Valencia-Sola, Lucía
Ojeda-Betancor, Nazario
Rodríguez Pérez, Aurelio Eduardo 
Clasificación UNESCO: 32 Ciencias médicas
710202 Códigos de conducta ética
Palabras clave: Intensive care unit
Life-sustaining therapies
Futility
Withholding
Withdrawal, et al.
Fecha de publicación: 2024
Publicación seriada: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 
Resumen: Background/Objectives: The change in critically ill patients makes limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) a widespread practice when therapeutic goals cannot be achieved. We aimed to describe the application of LTE in a post-surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU), analyze the measures used, the characteristics of the patients, and their evolution. Methods: Retrospective observational study, including all patients to whom LTE was applied in a postsurgical ICU between January 2021 and December 2022. The LTE defined were brain death, withdrawal of measures, and withholding. Withholding limitations included orders for no cardiopulmonary resuscitation, no orotracheal intubation, no reintubation, no tracheostomy, no renal replacement therapies, and no vasoactive support. Patient and ICU admission data were related to the applied LTE. Results: Of the 2056 admitted, LTE protocols were applied to 106 patients. The prevalence of LTE in the ICU was 5.1%. Data were analyzed in 80 patients. A total of 91.2% of patients had been admitted in an emergency situation, and 56.2% had been admitted after surgery. The most widespread limitation was treatment withholding (83.8%) compared to withdrawal (13.8%). No differences were found regarding who made the decision and the type of limitation employed. However, patients with the limitation of no intubation had a longer stay (p = 0.025). Additionally, the order of not starting or increasing vasopressor support resulted in a longer hospital stay (p = 0.007) and a significantly longer stay until death (p = 0.044). Conclusions: LTE is a frequent measure in critically ill patient management and is less common in the postoperative setting. The most widespread measure was withholding, with the do-not-resuscitate order being the most common. The decision was made mainly by the medical team and the family, respecting the wishes of the patients. A joint patient-centered approach should be made in these decisions to avoid futile treatment and ensure end-of-life comfort.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/133302
ISSN: 1648-9144
DOI: 10.3390/medicina60091461
Fuente: Medicina [ISSN 1648-9144], v. 60 (9), p. 1461 (Septiembre 2024)
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (775,09 kB)
Vista completa

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.