Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/119987
Título: | Treatment of laundry wastewater by different processes: optimization and life cycle assessment | Autores/as: | Pulido Melián, Elisenda Santiago Garcia, Dunia Esther León, Elena Vaswani Reboso, Jenifer Herrera-Melián, José Alberto |
Clasificación UNESCO: | 330810 Tecnología de aguas residuales 330806 Regeneración del agua |
Palabras clave: | Laundry wastewater Bioreactor Fenton Photo-Fenton Coagulation, et al. |
Fecha de publicación: | 2023 | Publicación seriada: | Journal Of Environmental Chemical Engineering | Resumen: | Wastewater from industrial laundries is often difficult to treat because it usually presents high turbidity and chemical oxygen demand (COD). We studied several processes for the treatment of laundry wastewater which was provided by a hotel in the south of Gran Canaria, Spain. More specifically, we studied coagulation with iron (III) sulphate, Fenton, photo-Fenton and a biological treatment (using a biofilter, and a granular activated carbon, GAC, filtration). The coagulation and Fenton processes produced large amounts of sludge and could not meet the required standards for water reuse in Spain. The use of photo-Fenton and the BF resulted in complete turbidity removal and high COD removal. However, we found that the effluent from the BF did not meet the COD removal criteria for water reuse, and thus a GAC filtration post-treatment was employed to reduce COD to acceptable levels. The photo-Fenton process alone did meet the criteria for water reuse. The estimated cost to treat 1 m3 of wastewater was 6.72 € for photo-Fenton and 0.71 € for BF + GAC. The cost and life cycle assessment analyses that were also performed revealed that the acquisition of the necessary reagents is the main contribution to the overall economic and environmental costs for both options, and that the BF + GAC option is notably cheaper. Additionally, this option also causes much lower environmental impacts than photo-Fenton. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/119987 | ISSN: | 2213-2929 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109302 | Fuente: | Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering [ISSN 2213-2929], v. 11 (2), 109302, (Abril 2023) |
Colección: | Artículos |
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.