Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/76754
Título: Automated peritoneal dialysis: a Spanish multicentre study
Autores/as: Fernández Rodríguez, Ana María
Vega-Díaz, Nicanor 
Palop Cubillo, Leocadia
Teixidó Plana, Josep
Guerrero Riscos, María A.
Montes Delgado, Rafael
Martín Herrera, Carmen
Andrés Ribes, Enrique
Tornero Molina, Fernando
Macías Heras, Manuel
Toledo González, Agustín 
García Cantón, César Jesús 
Ruíz Fernández, Ana
Bamonde Laborda, Eduardo
Navarro Zurita, Manuel
Fernández Girón, Fernando
Saavedra Santana, Pedro 
Clasificación UNESCO: 320506 Nefrología
Palabras clave: Automated Peritoneal Dialysis
CAPD
Clearances
PET
Fecha de publicación: 1998
Publicación seriada: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 
Resumen: Background. A prospective sequential study on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and three techniques of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) was conducted to assess peritoneal clearances, the influence of peritoneal permeability on nocturnal APD clearances and the suitability of the peritoneal equilibration test (PET) for predicting clearances on APD.Methods. After performing a PET, a series of clinical, biochemical and dialysis adequacy markers were evaluated after 2 months on CAPD, continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) and tidal volume peritoneal dialysis (TPD) with 50% and 25% tidal volumes. Forty five patients participated and 33 completed the study.Results. Serum urea and creatinine decreased significantly whereas haemoglobin and glucose increased. Mean peritoneal urea clearance (1/week) was 55.40 +/- 8.76 on CAPD, 74.82 +/-12.62 on CCPD, 69.20 +/- 14.63 on TPD (tidal 50%) and 66.59 +/- 13.23 on TPD (tidal 25%); mean creatinine clearance (1/week/1.73 m(2)) was 42.80 +/- 9.95, 52.19 +/- 11.11, 51.31 +/- 13.3 and 49.17 +/- 11.83, respectively. Both clearances were significantly lower on CAPD than on APD (P<0.001). CCPD was the automated technique that provided the best nocturnal urea clearance (P<0.01). Nocturnal creatinine clearance did not show significant differences between CCPD and TPD (tidal 50%), being better with both techniques than with TPD (tidal 25%). There were statistically significant differences between nocturnal dialysate to plasma (D/P) ratios and those corresponding to the nearest times in the PET. The urea D/P ratio at 180 min and the creatinine D/P ratio at 240 min of the PET were the parameters that better estimated nocturnal clearances on APD. Conclusions. This study confirms that TPD does not improve the results of CCPD. Significant differences between D/P ratios during actual nocturnal cycles and PETs were observed.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/76754
ISSN: 0931-0509
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/13.9.2335
Fuente: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation [ISSN 0931-0509], v. 13 (9), p. 2335-2340, (Septiembre 1998)
Colección:Artículos
miniatura
pdf
Adobe PDF (123,56 kB)
Vista completa

Citas SCOPUSTM   

49
actualizado el 24-mar-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

37
actualizado el 25-feb-2024

Visitas

93
actualizado el 02-dic-2023

Descargas

50
actualizado el 02-dic-2023

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.