Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/76335
Title: Sustainable Reclaimed Water Management by Subsurface Drip Irrigation System: a study case for forage production
Authors: Palacios Díaz, María Del Pino 
Mendoza Grimón, Vanessa Reyes 
Fernandez, F.
Fernández Vera, Juan Ramón 
Hernandez-Moreno, J. M.
UNESCO Clasification: 310307 Cultivos forrajeros
310391 Uso (manejo) combinado del agua y fertilizantes
330810 Tecnología de aguas residuales
Keywords: Advanced Treatment
Alfalfa
Water-Cost
Reclaimed-Water Management
Sdi, et al
Issue Date: 2008
Journal: Water Practice and Technology 
Abstract: In the Canary Islands the price fluctuation of groundwater (0.3 to 0.7 (sic)/m(3)), which is a private resource, often limits the recovery of the agricultural investments. Availability of alternative resources (reclaimed water: RW, desalinized seawater: DW and desalinized reclaimed water: DRW) at a foreseeable price will allow people to design the optimal infrastructures adapted to their needs The pumping cost is included in the "public" water price of DW (0.6 (sic)/m(3)), RW (0.2 (sic)/m(3)) and DRW (0.42 (sic)/m(3)), but only if it is under 300 m of altitude. As a subsurface irrigation system (SDI), uses the soil as a natural advanced (but not high cost) water treatment, the in situ reuse of RW produced by lower tech wastewater plants would provide a valuable resource for the small villages.A successful study case is presented here. A 2-year SDI experiment was performed using RW, cultivating alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and Sudan grass hybrid (Sorghum bicolor ssp sudanense). Although a saline (EC: 2.24 dS/m) and sodic (SAR: 6.9) water was used, irrigation with SDI led to high forage yields (between 8.4 and 11.9 kg of fresh matter/m2 obtained by 8 harvests per year). However, sand filter and drip lines have to be cleaned weakly and every 6 months respectively. As a conclusion of this study, adequate plant germination and yields, and feasibility of SDI using a secondary effluent was demonstrated. Besides, water cost represents only 24 to 17 % from the gross income.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/76335
ISSN: 1751-231X
DOI: 10.2166/WPT.2008049
Source: Water Practice And Technology [ISSN 1751-231X], v. 3 (2), (Junio 2008)
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Thumbnail
PDF
Adobe PDF (451,62 kB)
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on Jun 13, 2021

Page view(s)

24
checked on Jun 14, 2021

Download(s)

15
checked on Jun 14, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.