Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75687
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Rodríguez, Francisco J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDorta Afonso, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-de-la-Rosa, Manuelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-18T12:39:01Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-18T12:39:01Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn0278-4319en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/75687-
dc.description.abstractThe present study examines the effects of diversity management on hospitality employees’ organizational commitment and their job satisfaction taking into account individual differences. A representative sample of hotel workers were surveyed in the Canary Island, one of the main tourist destinations in the world, which receives over fifteen million tourists a year. Using moderated mediation analyses, the study confirms our hypothesis that employees’ perceptions of diversity management have a positive and significant direct effect on job satisfaction. In addition, an indirect effect through employees’ organizational commitment was found. Results support the moderating role of age, but not of ethnic origin or gender on the proposed mediation. From a managerial perspective, hoteliers should be encouraged to consider diversity management when they plan their human resource policies due to its positive effects on employees’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Hospitality Managementen_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Hospitality Management[ISSN 0278-4319],v. 91, (Octubre 2020)en_US
dc.subject.otherAgeen_US
dc.subject.otherEthnic Originen_US
dc.subject.otherGenderen_US
dc.subject.otherHospitality Diversity Managementen_US
dc.subject.otherJob Satisfactionen_US
dc.subject.otherOrganizational Commitmenten_US
dc.titleHospitality diversity management and job satisfaction: the mediating role of organizational commitment across individual differencesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102698en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85091797940-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004619946-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56725788200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57211082521-
dc.relation.volume91en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateOctubre 2020en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-ECOen_US
dc.description.sjr2,321
dc.description.jcr9,237
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.ssciSSCI
dc.description.erihplusERIH PLUS
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IDeTIC: División de Organizaciones, personas y conocimiento-
crisitem.author.deptIU para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Economía y Dirección de Empresas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9955-1202-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación-
crisitem.author.fullNameDorta Afonso, Daniel-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (415,18 kB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.