Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75539
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorCalbet, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrepat, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorAlmeda García, Rodrigoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaló, Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorSaiz, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorMovilla, JIen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlcaraz, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorYebra, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorSimó, Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T17:17:33Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-13T17:17:33Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.issn0948-3055en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/75539-
dc.description.abstractGrazing by microzooplankton is typically assessed by dilution experiments of the whole natural community. However, in many ecosystems these experiments actually include not only micrograzers but also nanograzers. We discerned the relevance of micro- and nanograzers under contrasting trophic situations in the coastal NW Mediterranean throughout a seasonal cycle. We measured the grazing upon total, <10 µm, and >10 µm chlorophyll a in 11 standard dilution experiments. We also conducted simultaneous dilution experiments with the <10 µm planktonic community, to assess the potential impact of <10 µm grazers when released of predatory pressure by larger consumers. From September 2005 to May 2006 the microbial grazers consumed less than half of the total phytoplankton production. From June 2006 and for the whole summer period, the grazing on total phytoplankton increased, ranging from 76 to 104% of the primary production consumed per day. On annual average, microbial grazers consumed 56% of the total primary production. Grazing on <10 µm phytoplankton was very variable, from not significant (January and March) to >100% of the primary production consumed daily in July and August (the average impact for the whole study period was 58%). Grazing impact on >10 µm cells was very low, only significant in 5 out of 11 experiments (average impact of 23% of the >10 µm primary production consumed daily, range 23 to 71%). When the entire microbial community was size-fractioned by 10 µm, the potential impact of <10 µm nanograzers was evident for most of the year, although during the spring the differences between the impact on phytoplankton <10 µm measured in these experiments and in standard (unfiltered) dilutions were higher. During the warmer months (July and August) the size distribution of the grazers’ community slightly shifted towards <10 µm organisms (72 to 88% of the biomass of grazers were <10 µm cells). Heterotrophic flagellates stood out as very relevant grazers in this system. In summary, the data suggest that the coastal NW Mediterranean is a system in which microzooplankton (>10 µm organisms) weakly control the primary producers during the cold season (winter and most of the autumn), switch to nano-sized heterotrophic prey during spring, partially suppressing the impact of this group on phytoplankton, and finally are replaced by nanograzers during the warmer months (end of the summer period), heavily impacting the dominant small primary producers.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relationMICROROL - Role of microzooplankton in marine food webs dynamics: functional diversity, relevance in C, N and P cycles and trophic impact on primary producers (CTM2004-02575/MAR)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAquatic Microbial Ecologyen_US
dc.sourceAquatic Microbial Ecology [ISSN 0948-3055], v. 50, n. 2, p. 145-156en_US
dc.subject251001 Oceanografía biológicaen_US
dc.subject.otherSize-fractionated dilutionsen_US
dc.subject.otherMicrozooplanktonen_US
dc.subject.otherNanograzersen_US
dc.subject.otherMicrobial grazersen_US
dc.subject.otherPhytoplanktonen_US
dc.subject.otherNW Mediterraneanen_US
dc.titleImpact of micro- and nanograzers on phytoplankton assessed by standard and size-fractionated dilution grazing experimentsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3354/ame01171en_US
dc.description.lastpage156en_US
dc.description.firstpage145en_US
dc.relation.volume50en_US
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages12en_US
dc.date.coverdate31 enero 2008en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcNoen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
dc.description.jcr2,19
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Ecofisiología de Organismos Marinos-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0090-112X-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.fullNameAlmeda García, Rodrigo-
Colección:Artículos
miniatura
PDF
Adobe PDF (240,03 kB)
Vista resumida

Visitas

89
actualizado el 03-feb-2024

Descargas

69
actualizado el 03-feb-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.