Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75454
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAcosta Arbelo, Félix Antonioen_US
dc.contributor.authorMontero Vítores, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorIzquierdo López, María Soledaden_US
dc.contributor.authorGalindo Villegas, Jorgeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-12T10:55:09Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-12T10:55:09Z-
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.issn0044-8486en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/75454-
dc.description.abstractThe use of effective biocides as disinfectants is essential in aquaculture facilities. However, while most biocides act effectively on free-living planktonic pathogens, they are seldom useful against biofilms. In this study, we evaluate the biocidal efficacy and antimicrobial specific contact time of three disinfectants, Virkon™Aquatic (VirA), peracetic acid (PerA) and hydrogen peroxide (HydP), on Vibrio anguillarum, V. harveyi, V. alginolyticus, and Photobacterium damselae subspecies piscicida against their both life phases. By using the minimum inhibitory, bactericidal, and eradication concentrations of disinfectants acting on the free-living planktonic state (MIC; MBC) and biofilms (MBIC; MBEC), we determined the in vitro susceptibility of each bacterial strain against three different individual concentrations of VirA, PerA, and HydP added at 1, 5, and 10 min intervals. PerA and VirA had the highest bactericidal efficacies against the free-living planktonic state and biofilm of all bacteria. Kinetically, PerA gave a positive result more quickly in both cases regardless of the strain in question, while the weakest HydP required longer than 10 min to act effectively. Moreover, we conducted a short in vivo safety trial by pouring the suggested MIC of each disinfectant into tanks containing juvenile Gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). A significant mortality after 24 h was observed pointing to the potential risk a mishap of these chemicals might cause to fish. Nevertheless, collectively, our results support the inclusion of biocides within biosecurity protocols in aquaculture facilities and highlight PerA as the most effective disinfectant for fighting against biofilms produced by V. anguillarum, V. harveyi, V. alginolyticus or P. damselae subsp. piscicida.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relationConsumer driven Production: Integrating Innovative Approaches for Competitive and Sustainable Performance across the Mediterranean Aquaculture Value Chainen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAquacultureen_US
dc.sourceAquaculture [ISSN 0044-8486], v. 532, 736004en_US
dc.subject251092 Acuicultura marinaen_US
dc.subject310907 Patologíaen_US
dc.subject310502 Pisciculturaen_US
dc.subject.otherAquacultureen_US
dc.subject.otherBiofilmsen_US
dc.subject.otherBacterial hazarden_US
dc.subject.otherDisinfectionen_US
dc.subject.otherGilthead seabreamen_US
dc.subject.otherγ-Proteobacteriaen_US
dc.subject.otherPeracetic aciden_US
dc.subject.otherVibrionaceaen_US
dc.titleHigh-level biocidal products effectively eradicate pathogenic γ-proteobacteria biofilms from aquaculture facilitiesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.736004en_US
dc.identifier.isi000600428000003-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5622-
dc.relation.volume532en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid40893708-
dc.contributor.daisngid233847-
dc.contributor.daisngid31444473-
dc.contributor.daisngid40566024-
dc.description.numberofpages10en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Acosta, F-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Montero, D-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Izquierdo, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Galindo-Villegas, J-
dc.date.coverdateFebrero 2021en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.description.sjr0,981
dc.description.jcr5,135
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.project.principalinvestigatorIzquierdo López, María Soledad-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1098-7529-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4358-2157-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4297-210X-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.fullNameAcosta Arbelo, Félix Antonio-
crisitem.author.fullNameMontero Vítores, Daniel-
crisitem.author.fullNameIzquierdo López, María Soledad-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Thumbnail
Adobe PDF (3,51 MB)
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

30
checked on Nov 10, 2024

Page view(s)

332
checked on Aug 10, 2024

Download(s)

211
checked on Aug 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.