Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75310
Title: | A global sensitivity analysis method applied to wind farm power output estimation models | Authors: | Carta González, José Antonio Díaz, Santiago Castañeda, A. |
UNESCO Clasification: | 330607 Maquinaria rotatoria 332205 Fuentes no convencionales de energía 332201 Distribución de la energía |
Keywords: | Ensemble Technique Global Sensitivity Analysis Shapley Effects Sobol' Indices Vine Copula Modelling, et al |
Issue Date: | 2020 | Project: | Adaptación Al Cambio Climático de Los Sistemas Energéticos de la Macaronesia | Journal: | Applied Energy | Abstract: | This paper proposes a global sensitivity analysis method applied to wind farm power output estimation models. The relevance of a global sensibility analysis is that it allows quantification of the contribution of the uncertainty of each input variable of the estimation model to the uncertainty of the response of the model. Measures of sensitivity based on Sobol' indices have been used in the field of energy. Sobol’ indices are constructed based on the assumption that the model input variables are statistically independent. The method proposed in this paper uses Shapley effects and a regular vine copula to take into account the probable dependency among the input variables of the models. The model used as case study is fed with sixteen meteorological variables and six operational variables. The following are some of the most important results obtained in the case study: a) Regular vine copulas were more suitable than the drawable vine and canonical vine subclass copulas to simulate the structure of dependency between the random input variables of the used wind farm power output estimation model; b) the Shapley effects were able to overcome the difficulty of interpretation presented by the Sobol' indices with respect to correlations among the input variables of the wind farm power output estimation model. In the case study, the wind speed, active power set-point and turbulence intensity variables explained 98.58% of the variance of the response of the model. The wind direction, nacelle orientation and air density variables only explained 1.42% of that variance. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75310 | ISSN: | 0306-2619 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115968 | Source: | Applied Energy[ISSN 0306-2619],v. 280 |
Appears in Collections: | Artículos |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
22
checked on Nov 17, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
20
checked on Nov 17, 2024
Page view(s)
278
checked on Oct 12, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Share
Export metadata
Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.