Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75310
Title: A global sensitivity analysis method applied to wind farm power output estimation models
Authors: Carta González, José Antonio 
Díaz, Santiago
Castañeda, A.
UNESCO Clasification: 330607 Maquinaria rotatoria
332205 Fuentes no convencionales de energía
332201 Distribución de la energía
Keywords: Ensemble Technique
Global Sensitivity Analysis
Shapley Effects
Sobol' Indices
Vine Copula Modelling, et al
Issue Date: 2020
Project: Adaptación Al Cambio Climático de Los Sistemas Energéticos de la Macaronesia 
Journal: Applied Energy 
Abstract: This paper proposes a global sensitivity analysis method applied to wind farm power output estimation models. The relevance of a global sensibility analysis is that it allows quantification of the contribution of the uncertainty of each input variable of the estimation model to the uncertainty of the response of the model. Measures of sensitivity based on Sobol' indices have been used in the field of energy. Sobol’ indices are constructed based on the assumption that the model input variables are statistically independent. The method proposed in this paper uses Shapley effects and a regular vine copula to take into account the probable dependency among the input variables of the models. The model used as case study is fed with sixteen meteorological variables and six operational variables. The following are some of the most important results obtained in the case study: a) Regular vine copulas were more suitable than the drawable vine and canonical vine subclass copulas to simulate the structure of dependency between the random input variables of the used wind farm power output estimation model; b) the Shapley effects were able to overcome the difficulty of interpretation presented by the Sobol' indices with respect to correlations among the input variables of the wind farm power output estimation model. In the case study, the wind speed, active power set-point and turbulence intensity variables explained 98.58% of the variance of the response of the model. The wind direction, nacelle orientation and air density variables only explained 1.42% of that variance.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/75310
ISSN: 0306-2619
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115968
Source: Applied Energy[ISSN 0306-2619],v. 280
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
checked on Nov 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

20
checked on Nov 17, 2024

Page view(s)

278
checked on Oct 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.