Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/74816
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNúñez Alonso, Juan Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorGagné, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorForest, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVansteenkiste, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorCrevier-Braud, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVan den Broeck, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAspeli, A. K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBattistelli, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBellerose, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBenabou, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChemolli, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGüntert, S. T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHalvari, H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIndiyastuti, D. L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMans, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMartin-Albo, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMolstad, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNaudin, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNtalianis, F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOlafson, A. H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPanagopoulou, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPortoghese, I,en_US
dc.contributor.authorRoussel, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWestbye, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Z.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-16T15:48:14Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-16T15:48:14Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/74816-
dc.description.abstractResults of a cross-cultural validation study of the Revised Motivation at W ork Scale are presented. This scale is based on self-determination theory and comprises subscales for amotivation, extemal regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation and intrinsic motivation. It attempts to improve over previous scales by fixing problems with validity and subscale reliability. Data was obtained from 4783 participants and shows evidence for the reliability and structural invariance of the scale in ten different languages (i.e., French, English, Spanish, Italian, Dutch, Norwegian, Greek, German, Chinese, and Indonesian). Evidence for the scale’s convergent and discriminant validity was found, as the subscales were predictably related to theoretically relevant antecedents and consequences of work motivation. The results also validate the relevance of self-determination theory as a work motivation theory. Implications for research and practice are discussed.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.sourceIWP International Conference 2012. Sheffield, UK.en_US
dc.subject61 Psicologíaen_US
dc.subject580206 Análisis, realización de modelos y planificación estadísticaen_US
dc.titleValidation evidence in ten languages for the Revised Motivation at Work Scaleen_US
dc.relation.conferenceIWP International Conference 2012en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicasen_US
dc.type2Actas de congresosen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgces
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Didáctica, Aprendizaje y Motivación en Contextos Específicos-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Psicología, Sociología y Trabajo Social-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2400-7843-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Educación-
crisitem.author.fullNameNúñez Alonso, Juan Luis-
Appears in Collections:Actas de congresos
Thumbnail
Adobe PDF (189,4 kB)
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

630
checked on Aug 26, 2023

Download(s)

205
checked on Aug 26, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.