Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/74037
Title: Assessment of side branch predilation before a provisional T-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions. A randomized trial
Authors: Pan, Manuel
Medina, Alfonso
Romero, Miguel
Ojeda, Soledad
Martin, Pedro
Suarez De Lezo, Javier
Segura, Jose
Mazuelos, Francisco
Novoa, Jose
Suarez De Lezo, Jose
UNESCO Clasification: 320501 Cardiología
Issue Date: 2014
Journal: The American heart journal 
Abstract: Background A simple approach is the predominant strategy for the percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions. Performing side branch (SB) predilation in this context is currently a matter of controversy. In this study, we assess the efficacy of SB predilatation before a provisional T-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions. Methods Between February 2009 and November 2012, 372 patients with true bifurcation lesions were randomized to either predilation of the SB (n = 187) or no predilatation (n = 185) before main branch (MB) stent implantation and a subsequent SB provisional stent strategy. Results There were no significant differences between the patient groups regarding the baseline characteristics. After MB stent implantation, the TIMI flow of the SB was higher in the patients with SB predilation: TIMI flow 0 to 1; 2 (1%) versus 18 (10%), P <.001; and TIMI flow III; 179 (96%) versus 152 (82%), P <.001. Side branch stenting rates were 4% versus 3%, P = not significant. In addition, 60 patients (32%) from the SB predilation group presented SB residual stenosis by visual inspection <50%, and TIMI flow â III did not require any additional treatment. The failure rate of SB rewiring, the time of rewiring, the number of wires used, and the incidence of major events were similar in both groups of patients. Conclusions Predilation of the SB resulted in improved TIMI flow after MB stenting and less indication to subsequently treat the SB. If rewiring of the SB is required, predilation did not hinder this maneuver.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/74037
ISSN: 0002-8703
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.05.014
Source: American Heart Journal [ISSN 0002-8703], v. 168 (3), p. 374-380, (Enero 2014)
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

24
checked on Sep 20, 2020

Page view(s)

8
checked on Sep 20, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.