Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/73943
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMedina Ramírez, Raquel Irina-
dc.contributor.authorÁlamo Arce, Daniel David-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez de Castro, Felipe-
dc.contributor.authorCecilio-Fernandes, Dario-
dc.contributor.authorSandars, John-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Manuel J.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-04T09:12:49Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-04T09:12:49Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn1472-6920-
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/73943-
dc.description.abstractStudents require feedback on their self-regulated learning (SRL) processes to improve the performance of clinical examinations. The key SRL processes used by students can be identified by SRL-micro-analysis but, this method has not been previously applied to physiotherapy students. The aim of this pilot study was to test a research design that might allow the evaluation of the potential usefulness of SRL microanalysis for the identification of key SRL processes used by physiotherapy students during the performance of a clinical examination skill. The objectives of the pilot study were: 1) to evaluate whether SRL-microanalysis could identify differences in the use of SRL processes between successful and unsuccessful students; 2) to evaluate the reliability of SRL microanalysis ratings produced by different assessors. METHODS: SRL-microanalysis was used with second year physiotherapy students of a Spanish university (n = 26) as they performed a goniometric task. The task required students to obtain a goniometric measurement of the shoulder joint of a peer. Two assessors evaluated student performance and conducted the SRL- microanalysis with all students. An analysis of inter-rater reliability was performed to evaluate the degree of agreement between assessors. RESULTS: The SRL-microanalysis revealed differences in the use of key SRL processes between successful (n = 15: 57.0%) and unsuccessful performers (n = 11: 43.0%): The differences were particularly evident in strategic planning and self-monitoring skills. There was good inter-rater reliability for scoring of strategic planning (k = 0.792), self-monitoring (k = 0.946) and self-evaluation (k = 0.846). CONCLUSION: The use of SRL microanalysis characterized the key SRL processes of physiotherapy students performing a clinical skill with reliability between the assessors. This pilot study supports the potential usefulness of SRL-microanalysis for the identification of key SRL processes in physiotherapy education. Therefore, this study paves the way to the development of a full study, with a larger number of students and more diverse clinical tasks, to evaluate the SRL processes in successful and unsuccessful students.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Medical Education-
dc.sourceBMC medical education [EISSN 1472-6920], v. 20 (1), 233, (Julio 2020)-
dc.subject321311 Fisioterapia-
dc.subject.otherAssessment Process-
dc.subject.otherClinical Skills-
dc.subject.otherHealth Student-
dc.subject.otherPhysical Therapy Techniques-
dc.subject.otherSelf-Regulated Learning-
dc.titleSelf-regulated learning microanalysis for the study of the performance of clinical examinations by physiotherapy students-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Article-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12909-020-02149-7-
dc.identifier.pmid32698789-
dc.identifier.scopus85088465709-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000555089800001-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1015-847X-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57218250648-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57189491381-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57218249231-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57189241650-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid8906523700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55730211000-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6920-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.relation.volume20-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Salud-
dc.type2Artículo-
dc.utils.revision-
dc.date.coverdateJulio 2020-
dc.identifier.ulpgc-
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MED-
dc.description.sjr0,809-
dc.description.jcr2,463-
dc.description.sjrqQ1-
dc.description.jcrqQ2-
dc.description.scieSCIE-
dc.description.ssciSSCI-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Sociedad Digital-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Sociedad Digital-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Patología y Tecnología médica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1015-847X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8248-9094-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6812-2739-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Psicología, Sociología y Trabajo Social-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Psicología, Sociología y Trabajo Social-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameMedina Ramírez,Raquel Irina-
crisitem.author.fullNameÁlamo Arce, Daniel David-
crisitem.author.fullNameRodríguez De Castro, Felipe Carlos B.-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Thumbnail
Adobe PDF (553,8 kB)
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.