Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Open access effect on uncitedness: a large-scale study controlling by discipline, source type and visibility
Authors: Dorta González, Pablo 
Suárez Vega, Rafael Ricardo 
Dorta González,María Isabel 
UNESCO Clasification: 570106 Documentación
Keywords: Citescore
Differences By Field
Open Access
Uncited Rate
Uncitedness Ratio
Issue Date: 2020
Journal: Scientometrics 
Abstract: There are many factors that affect the probability of being uncited during the first years after publication. In this study, we analyze three of these factors for journals, conference proceedings and book series: the field (in 316 subject categories of the Scopus database), the access modality (open access vs. paywalled), and the visibility of the source (through the percentile of the average impact in the subject category). We quantify the effect of these factors on the probability of being uncited. This probability is measured through the percentage of uncited documents in the serial sources of the Scopus database at about two years after publication. As a main result, we do not find any strong correlation between open access and uncitedness. Within the group of most cited journals (Q1 and top 10%), open access journals generally have somewhat lower uncited rates. However, in the intermediate quartiles (Q2 and Q3) almost no differences are observed, while for Q4 the uncited rate is again somewhat lower in the case of the OA group. This is important because it provides new evidence in the debate about open access citation advantage.
ISSN: 0138-9130
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03557-8
Source: Scientometrics[ISSN 0138-9130], v. 124, p. 2619–2644
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record


checked on Dec 4, 2022

Page view(s)

checked on Oct 29, 2022

Google ScholarTM




Export metadata

Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.