Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/73421
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Hoyo, Moisesen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanudo, Borjaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco, Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Manso, Juan Manuelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-22T09:48:38Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-22T09:48:38Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/73421-
dc.description.abstractDa Silva-Grigoletto, ME, de Hoyo, M, Sanudo, B, Corrales, L, and Garcia-Manso, JM. Determining the optimal whole-body vibration dose-response relationship for muscle performance. J Strength Cond Res 25(12): 3326-3333, 2011-The aim of this investigation was twofold: first, to determine the optimal duration of a single whole-body vibration (WBV) exposure (phase 1) and second to find out the ideal number of sets per intervention to maximize muscle performance (phase 2). All participants were young (age: 19.4 +/- 1.6 years), healthy, physically active men. In both studies, a 30-Hz frequency and a 4-mm peak-to-peak displacement were used. In phase 1, subjects (n = 30) underwent 3 sets of different durations (30, 60, and 90 seconds), whereas in phase 2, subjects (n = 27) underwent 3 interventions where the duration remained fixed at 60 seconds, and the number of sets performed (3, 6, or 9) was modified. The recovery time between sets was set at 2 minutes. In all interventions, each set consisted of 1 isometric repetition in a squat position with knees flexed at 100 degrees. Before and after each session, jump height (countermovement jump [CMJ] and squat jump [SJ]) and power output in half squat (90 degrees knee flexion) were assessed. In phase 1, an improvement in jump ability and power output was observed after the 30- and 60-second intervention (p < 0.01), whereas the 90 second intervention, participants just experienced a decrease in SJ and CMJ (p < 0.05). When comparing the different protocols, the greatest response was achieved using 60 seconds (p < 0.05), which was therefore considered as the optimal duration to be used in phase 2. In the second phase, improvements in jump ability and power output were found with 3 and 6 sets (p < 0.05), whereas with 9 sets, participants actually experienced a decrease in these variables. Intergroup comparison showed a greater effect for the program of 6 sets (p < 0.05). In conclusion, a WBV intervention consisting of six 60-second sets produces improved muscle performance measured by SJ, CMJ, and power output.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Strength and Conditioning Researchen_US
dc.sourceJournal Of Strength And Conditioning Research[ISSN 1064-8011],v. 25 (12), p. 3326-3333, (Diciembre 2011)en_US
dc.subject.otherMaximal Voluntary Contractionsen_US
dc.subject.otherRandomized Cross-Overen_US
dc.subject.otherHormonal Responsesen_US
dc.subject.otherForce Developmenten_US
dc.subject.otherMechanical Poweren_US
dc.subject.otherJump Performanceen_US
dc.subject.otherExerciseen_US
dc.subject.otherStrengthen_US
dc.subject.otherFrequenciesen_US
dc.subject.otherExposureen_US
dc.subject.otherVibration Trainingen_US
dc.subject.otherJump Abilityen_US
dc.subject.otherMuscular Poweren_US
dc.titleDetermining The Optimal Whole-Body Vibration Dose-Response Relationship For Muscle Performanceen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182163047en_US
dc.identifier.isi000297987000014-
dc.identifier.eissn1533-4287-
dc.description.lastpage3333en_US
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.description.firstpage3326en_US
dc.relation.volume25en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid1417974-
dc.contributor.daisngid1670909-
dc.contributor.daisngid1170474-
dc.contributor.daisngid34640041-
dc.contributor.daisngid1345341-
dc.description.numberofpages8en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Da Silva-Grigoletto, ME-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:De Hoyo, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Sanudo, B-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Carrasco, L-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Garcia-Manso, JM-
dc.date.coverdateDiciembre 2011en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr1,136
dc.description.jcr1,831
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Praxiología motriz, entrenamiento deportivo, didáctica de las actividades físicas y salud-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4360-3384-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Educación Física-
crisitem.author.fullNameGarcía Manso,Juan Manuel-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

29
checked on Oct 6, 2024

Page view(s)

68
checked on Feb 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.