Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/73421
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Hoyo, Moisesen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanudo, Borjaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco, Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Manso, Juan Manuelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-22T09:48:38Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-22T09:48:38Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/73421-
dc.description.abstractDa Silva-Grigoletto, ME, de Hoyo, M, Sanudo, B, Corrales, L, and Garcia-Manso, JM. Determining the optimal whole-body vibration dose-response relationship for muscle performance. J Strength Cond Res 25(12): 3326-3333, 2011-The aim of this investigation was twofold: first, to determine the optimal duration of a single whole-body vibration (WBV) exposure (phase 1) and second to find out the ideal number of sets per intervention to maximize muscle performance (phase 2). All participants were young (age: 19.4 +/- 1.6 years), healthy, physically active men. In both studies, a 30-Hz frequency and a 4-mm peak-to-peak displacement were used. In phase 1, subjects (n = 30) underwent 3 sets of different durations (30, 60, and 90 seconds), whereas in phase 2, subjects (n = 27) underwent 3 interventions where the duration remained fixed at 60 seconds, and the number of sets performed (3, 6, or 9) was modified. The recovery time between sets was set at 2 minutes. In all interventions, each set consisted of 1 isometric repetition in a squat position with knees flexed at 100 degrees. Before and after each session, jump height (countermovement jump [CMJ] and squat jump [SJ]) and power output in half squat (90 degrees knee flexion) were assessed. In phase 1, an improvement in jump ability and power output was observed after the 30- and 60-second intervention (p < 0.01), whereas the 90 second intervention, participants just experienced a decrease in SJ and CMJ (p < 0.05). When comparing the different protocols, the greatest response was achieved using 60 seconds (p < 0.05), which was therefore considered as the optimal duration to be used in phase 2. In the second phase, improvements in jump ability and power output were found with 3 and 6 sets (p < 0.05), whereas with 9 sets, participants actually experienced a decrease in these variables. Intergroup comparison showed a greater effect for the program of 6 sets (p < 0.05). In conclusion, a WBV intervention consisting of six 60-second sets produces improved muscle performance measured by SJ, CMJ, and power output.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Strength and Conditioning Researchen_US
dc.sourceJournal Of Strength And Conditioning Research[ISSN 1064-8011],v. 25 (12), p. 3326-3333, (Diciembre 2011)en_US
dc.subject.otherMaximal Voluntary Contractionsen_US
dc.subject.otherRandomized Cross-Overen_US
dc.subject.otherHormonal Responsesen_US
dc.subject.otherForce Developmenten_US
dc.subject.otherMechanical Poweren_US
dc.subject.otherJump Performanceen_US
dc.subject.otherExerciseen_US
dc.subject.otherStrengthen_US
dc.subject.otherFrequenciesen_US
dc.subject.otherExposureen_US
dc.subject.otherVibration Trainingen_US
dc.subject.otherJump Abilityen_US
dc.subject.otherMuscular Poweren_US
dc.titleDetermining The Optimal Whole-Body Vibration Dose-Response Relationship For Muscle Performanceen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182163047en_US
dc.identifier.isi000297987000014-
dc.identifier.eissn1533-4287-
dc.description.lastpage3333en_US
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.description.firstpage3326en_US
dc.relation.volume25en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid1417974-
dc.contributor.daisngid1670909-
dc.contributor.daisngid1170474-
dc.contributor.daisngid34640041-
dc.contributor.daisngid1345341-
dc.description.numberofpages8en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Da Silva-Grigoletto, ME-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:De Hoyo, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Sanudo, B-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Carrasco, L-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Garcia-Manso, JM-
dc.date.coverdateDiciembre 2011en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr1,136
dc.description.jcr1,831
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Praxiología motriz, entrenamiento deportivo, didáctica de las actividades físicas y salud-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4360-3384-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Educación Física-
crisitem.author.fullNameGarcía Manso,Juan Manuel-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

30
actualizado el 15-dic-2024

Visitas

94
actualizado el 09-nov-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.