Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/6850
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorThomsen, Mads S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWernberg, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorTuya, F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVanderklift, Mat A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHolmer, Marianneen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcGlathery, Karen J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArenas, Franciscoen_US
dc.contributor.authorKotta, Jonneen_US
dc.contributor.authorSilliman, Brian R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEngelen, Aschwin H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-17T02:31:00Z-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-08T13:14:29Z-
dc.date.available2012-01-17T12:16:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-08T13:14:29Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/6850-
dc.description.abstractSeagrasses are important habitat-formers and ecosystem engineers that are under threat from bloom-forming seaweeds. These seaweeds have been suggested to outcompete the seagrasses, particularly when facilitated by eutrophication, causing regime shifts where green meadows and clear waters are replaced with unstable sediments, turbid waters, hypoxia, and poor habitat conditions for fishes and invertebrates. Understanding the situations under which seaweeds impact seagrasses on local patch scales can help proactive management and prevent losses at greater scales. Here, we provide a quantitative review of available published manipulative experiments (all conducted at the patch scale), to test which attributes of seaweeds and seagrasses (e.g., their abundances, sizes, morphology, taxonomy, attachment type, or origin) influence impacts. Weighted and unweighted meta-analyses (Hedges d metric) of 59 experiments showed generally high variability in attribute-impact relationships. Our main significant findings were that (a) abundant seaweeds had stronger negative impacts on seagrasses than sparse seaweeds, (b) unattached and epiphytic seaweeds had stronger impacts than ‘rooted’ seaweeds, and (c) small seagrass species were more susceptible than larger species. Findings (a) and (c) were rather intuitive. It was more surprising that ‘rooted’ seaweeds had comparatively small impacts, particularly given that this category included the infamous invasive Caulerpa species. This result may reflect that seaweed biomass and/or shading and metabolic by-products like anoxia and sulphides could be lower for rooted seaweeds. In conclusion, our results represent simple and robust first-order generalities about seaweed impacts on seagrasses. This review also documented a limited number of primary studies. We therefore identified major knowledge gaps that need to be addressed before general predictive models on seaweed-seagrass interactions can be build, in order to effectively protect seagrass habitats from detrimental competition from seaweeds.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONEen_US
dc.sourcePLoS ONE [ISSN 1932-6203], v. 7(1): e28595en_US
dc.subject241705 Biología marinaen_US
dc.subject.otherEelgrass Zostera-Marinaen_US
dc.subject.otherMacroalga Chaetomorpha-Linumen_US
dc.subject.otherGracilaria-Vermiculophyllaen_US
dc.subject.otherNutrient Availabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherThalassia-Testudinumen_US
dc.subject.otherCymodocea-Nodosaen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Invasionsen_US
dc.subject.otherUlva-Rigidaen_US
dc.subject.otherDrift Algaeen_US
dc.subject.otherDense Matsen_US
dc.titleA meta-analysis of seaweed impacts on seagrasses: generalities and knowledge gapsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0028595en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84855605262-
dc.identifier.scopus84855605262-
dc.identifier.isi000301353900002-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7201684589-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid8657683700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6701622770-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603608107-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602080870-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003417535-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6701715245-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003952566-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602539505-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6701473658-
dc.identifier.absysnet655807-
dc.identifier.crisid-;-;19447;-;-;-;-;-;-;--
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.relation.volume7en_US
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid461261-
dc.contributor.daisngid272528-
dc.contributor.daisngid734126-
dc.contributor.daisngid308553-
dc.contributor.daisngid639170-
dc.contributor.daisngid215257-
dc.contributor.daisngid428738-
dc.contributor.daisngid735368-
dc.contributor.daisngid288341-
dc.contributor.daisngid230150-
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Thomsen, MS-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Wernberg, T-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Engelen, AH-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Tuya, F-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Vanderklift, MA-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Holmer, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:McGlathery, KJ-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Arenas, F-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Kotta, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Sillimann, BR-
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2012en_US
dc.identifier.supplement-;-;19447;-;-;-;-;-;-;--
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr1,945
dc.description.jcr3,73
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.erihplusERIH PLUS
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Biodiversidad y Conservación-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8316-5887-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.fullNameTuya Cortés, Fernando José-
Colección:Artículos
miniatura
Adobe PDF (321,05 kB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Este elemento está sujeto a una licencia Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons