Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/6230
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaltar González, Federicoen_US
dc.contributor.authorAristegui, Javieren_US
dc.contributor.authorGasol, Josep M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLekunberri, I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHerndl, Gerhard J.en_US
dc.contributor.otherGasol, Josep M-
dc.contributor.otherAristegui, Javier-
dc.contributor.otherBaltar, Federico-
dc.contributor.otherHerndl, Gerhard-
dc.contributor.otherLekunberri, Itziar-
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-12T02:31:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-08T13:08:27Z-
dc.date.available2011-08-12T04:00:11Z
dc.date.available2018-03-08T13:08:27Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-7362en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/6230-
dc.description.abstractTo investigate the effects of mesoscale eddies on prokaryotic assemblage structure and activity, we\nsampled two cyclonic eddies (CEs) and two anticyclonic eddies (AEs) in the permanent eddy-field\ndownstream the Canary Islands. The eddy stations were compared with two far-field (FF) stations\nlocated also in the Canary Current, but outside the influence of the eddy field. The distribution of\nprokaryotic abundance (PA), bulk prokaryotic heterotrophic activity (PHA), various indicators of\nsingle-cell activity (such as nucleic acid content, proportion of live cells, and fraction of cells\nactively incorporating leucine), as well as bacterial and archaeal community structure were\ndetermined from the surface to 2000m depth. In the upper epipelagic layer (0-200 m), the effect of\neddies on the prokaryotic community was more apparent, as indicated by the higher PA, PHA,\nfraction of living cells, and percentage of active cells incorporating leucine within eddies than at FF\nstations. Prokaryotic community composition differed also between eddy and FF stations in the\nepipelagic layer. In the mesopelagic layer (200-1000 m), there were also significant differences in PA\nand PHA between eddy and FF stations, although in general, there were no clear differences in\ncommunity composition or single-cell activity. The effects on prokaryotic activity and community\nstructure were stronger in AE than CE, decreasing with depth in both types of eddies. Overall, both\ntypes of eddies show distinct community compositions (as compared with FF in the epipelagic), and\nrepresent oceanic ?hotspots? of prokaryotic activity (in the epi- and mesopelagic realms).en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofISME Journalen_US
dc.rightsby-nc-ndes
dc.sourceIsme Journal [ISSN 1751-7362], v. 4 (8), p. 975-988en_US
dc.subject251001 Oceanografía biológicaen_US
dc.subject.otherArchaeaen_US
dc.subject.otherBacteriaen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunity compositionen_US
dc.subject.otherMicrobial activityen_US
dc.subject.otherMesoscale eddyen_US
dc.titleMesoscale eddies: Hotspots of prokaryotic activity and differential community structure in the oceanen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/ismej.2010.33
dc.identifier.scopus77954834264
dc.identifier.isi000280592600003
dcterms.isPartOfIsme Journal
dcterms.sourceIsme Journal[ISSN 1751-7362],v. 4 (8), p. 975-988
dc.contributor.authorscopusid23476314200
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006816204
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003299234
dc.contributor.authorscopusid14045386600
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005513845
dc.identifier.absysnet616823es
dc.identifier.crisid-;2728;-;-;-
dc.description.lastpage988-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.description.firstpage975-
dc.relation.volume4-
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid1232580-
dc.contributor.daisngid227201-
dc.contributor.daisngid97985-
dc.contributor.daisngid1807113-
dc.contributor.daisngid99734-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDB-1709-2008-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDD-5833-2013-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDC-3260-2012-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDB-1513-2013-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDNo ID-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Baltar, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Aristegui, J
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gasol, JM
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Lekunberri, I
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Herndl, GJ
dc.date.coverdateAgosto 2010
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.jcr6,153
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IOCAG: Oceanografía Biológica y Algología Aplicada-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Oceanografía y Cambio Global-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7526-7741-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Oceanografía y Cambio Global-
crisitem.author.fullNameArístegui Ruiz, Javier-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Thumbnail
Artículo ISME, 2010
Adobe PDF (838,46 kB)
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

74
checked on Apr 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

75
checked on Feb 25, 2024

Page view(s)

81
checked on Dec 9, 2023

Download(s)

128
checked on Dec 9, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.