Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/52647
Title: Convergent and construct validity and test-retest reliability of the Caen Chronotype Questionnaire in six languages
Authors: Laborde, Sylvain
Dosseville, Fabrice
Aloui, Asma
Ben Saad, Helmi
Bertollo, Maurizio
Bortoli, Laura
Braun, Barbara
Chamari, Karim
Chtourou, Hamdi
De Kort, Yvonne
Farooq, Abdulaziz
Gordijn, Marijke C. M.
Greco, Pablo
Guillén, Félix 
Haddad, Monoem
Hosang, Thomas
Khalladi, Karim
Lericollais, Romain
Lopes, Mariana
Robazza, Claudio
Smolders, Karin
Wurm, Alexander
Allen, Mark S.
UNESCO Clasification: 241106 Fisiología del ejercicio
Keywords: Fit Indexes
Sleep
Morningness
Validation
Amplitude, et al
Issue Date: 2018
Journal: Chronobiology International 
Abstract: Chronotype questionnaires provide a simple and time-effective approach to assessing individual differences in circadian variations. Chronotype questionnaires traditionally focused on one dimension of chronotype, namely its orientation along a continuum of morningness and eveningness. The Caen Chronotype Questionnaire (CCQ) was developed to assess an additional dimension of chronotype that captures the extent to which individual functioning varies during the day (amplitude). The aim of this study was to provide a multilanguage validation of the CCQ in six world regions (Arabic, Dutch, German, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish). At Time 1, a total of 2788 participants agreed to take part in the study (Arabic, n = 731; Dutch, n = 538; German, n=329; Italian, n = 473; Portuguese, n = 361; Spanish, n = 356). Participants completed an assessment of the CCQ together with the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ; Horne & Ostberg 1976) as well as questions related to factors theoretically related to chronotype (age, shift work, physical activity, sleep parameters and coffee consumption). One month later, participants again completed the CCQ. Results showed that the two-factor structure (morningness-eveningness and amplitude) of the CCQ could be replicated in all six languages. However, measurement invariance could not be assumed regarding the factor loadings across languages, meaning that items loaded more on their factors in some translations than in others. Test-retest reliability of the CCQ ranged from unacceptable (German version) to excellent (Dutch, Portuguese). Convergent validity was established through small-medium effect size correlations between the morningness-eveningness dimension of the CCQ and the MEQ. Taken together, our findings generally support the use of the translated versions of the CCQ. Further validation work on the CCQ is required including convergent validation against physiological markers of sleep, health and well-being.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/52647
ISSN: 0742-0528
DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2018.1475396
Source: Chronobiology International [ISSN 0742-0528], v. 35 (9), p. 1294-1304
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Apr 18, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Apr 18, 2021

Page view(s)

21
checked on Apr 17, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.