Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51552
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Dorta, N.
dc.contributor.authorCognié, Y.
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, F.
dc.contributor.authorPoulin, N.
dc.contributor.authorGuignot, F.
dc.contributor.authorTouzé, J. L.
dc.contributor.authorBaril, G.
dc.contributor.authorCabrera, F.
dc.contributor.authorÁlamo, D.
dc.contributor.authorBatista, M.
dc.contributor.authorGracia, A.
dc.contributor.authorMermillod, P.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-25T01:37:48Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-25T01:37:48Z-
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn0093-691X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/51552-
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluates the effect of coculture with goat oviduct epithelial cells (GOEC) on the pregnancy rate, embryo survival rate and offspring development after direct transfer of vitrified/thawed caprine in vitro produced (IVP) embryos. Oocytes were recovered from slaughterhouse goat ovaries, matured and inseminated with frozen/thawed capacitated semen, and presumptive zygotes were randomly cultured in synthetic oviduct fluid (SOF) (n = 352) or GOEC (n = 314). The percentage of cleaved embryos reaching the blastocyst stage was 28% and 20% in SOF and GOEC, respectively (P < 0.05). Overall, 26 blastocysts of SOF were transferred freshly in pairs to recipient goats, whereas 58 of SOF and 36 of GOEC were vitrified and transferred directly in pairs to recipient goats after thawing without removal of cryoprotectants or morphological evaluation. The kidding rate was 92% for SOF fresh, 14% for SOF vitrified (P < 0.001) and 56% for GOEC vitrified (P < 0.05); the difference was also significant between vitrified groups (P < 0.01). The embryo survival rate was 62% for SOF fresh, 9% for SOF vitrified (P < 0.001) and 33% for GOEC vitrified (P < 0.05) with a significant difference between vitrified groups (P < 0.01). The results showed that the coculture of IVP goat embryos with GOEC significantly improves the pregnancy and embryo survival rates and leads to the birth of healthy offspring. However, further research using more defined GOEC coculture is required to confirm its capacity to increase the success rate of IVP embryo technology in goat. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.publisher0093-691X
dc.relation.ispartofTheriogenology
dc.sourceTheriogenology[ISSN 0093-691X],v. 68, p. 908-913
dc.subject.otherAmino-Acids
dc.subject.otherSheep
dc.subject.otherCulture
dc.subject.otherVivo
dc.subject.otherMaturation
dc.subject.otherOocyte
dc.subject.otherFertilization
dc.subject.otherTechnologies
dc.subject.otherSurvival
dc.subject.otherQuality
dc.titleEffect of coculture with oviduct epithelial cells on viability after transfer of vitrified in vitro produced goat embryos
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articlees
dc.typeArticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.07.004
dc.identifier.scopus34548312102
dc.identifier.isi000249960700013
dc.contributor.authorscopusid20436635900
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004038354
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57194243767
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003630865
dc.contributor.authorscopusid8901474500
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005073034
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003384467
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006639324
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6507009446
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506315360
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006185082
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004107003
dc.description.lastpage913
dc.description.firstpage908
dc.relation.volume68
dc.type2Artículoes
dc.contributor.daisngid21009340
dc.contributor.daisngid474777
dc.contributor.daisngid30452093
dc.contributor.daisngid16987915
dc.contributor.daisngid1791788
dc.contributor.daisngid1482827
dc.contributor.daisngid3987445
dc.contributor.daisngid2128761
dc.contributor.daisngid1791005
dc.contributor.daisngid30341669
dc.contributor.daisngid7908263
dc.contributor.daisngid196432
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Rodriguez-Dorta, N
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cognie, Y
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gonzalez, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Poulin, N
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Guignot, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Touze, JL
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Baril, G
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cabrera, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Alamo, D
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Batista, M
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gracia, A
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Mermillod, P
dc.date.coverdateOctubre 2007
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.jcr1,911
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medicina Veterinaria e Investigación Terapéutica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9753-4786-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameCabrera Martín, Fernando-
crisitem.author.fullNameBatista Arteaga, Miguel-
crisitem.author.fullNameGracia Molina, Anselmo-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.