Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51546
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorBatista Arteaga, Miguelen_US
dc.contributor.authorNiño, T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSantana, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlamo, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCabrera Martín, Fernandoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGracia Molina, Anselmoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-25T01:34:38Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-25T01:34:38Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.issn0921-4488en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/51546-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to assess the influence of cool storage (5 °C) prior cryopreservation over the post-thaw quality of buck semen samples. Semen of six Majorera bucks (n = 18 ejaculates) was collected, pooled and diluted in a Tris-yolk extender. Then, diluted semen was divided into six aliquots; the first aliquot (group C) was processed and frozen in liquid nitrogen (final concentration of 400 × 106 spermatozoa/mL, 12% egg-yolk and 4% glycerol). The remaining aliquots (diluted with Tris–glucose, 12% egg yolk) were hold for 1–48 h at 4 °C: R1, the semen was cooled for 1 h; R6, the semen was cooled for 6 h; R12, the semen was cooled for 12 h; R24, the semen was cooled for 24 h and R48, the semen was cooled for 48 h. After each cooling period, a second extender was added to reach a final composition (400 × 106 spermatozoa/mL, 12% egg-yolk and 4% glycerol) similar to group C; finally, semen was packed and frozen in liquid nitrogen. After freezing–thawing, the sperm motility, acrosome integrity and the percentage of abnormal spermatozoa were assessed. No differences (P > 0.05) were detected in progressive sperm motility (mean range: 35.4–39.9%) and damage acrosomes percentages (mean: 10.8–15.5%) among the control group and the cooled semen samples (R1, R6, R12, and R24) for up to 24 h; however, R48 samples showed a lower (21.6%, P < 0.01) progressive fast spermatozoa percentage and a higher percentage of damage acrosome (38.3%, P < 0.01) than those observed in the control group and in R1, R6, R12 and R24 samples. The present study confirmed that buck semen could be preserved at 5 °C for up to 24 h before freezing; however, after 2 days of chilling, semen quality experienced a notable decrease and its utility could be lower.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSmall Ruminant Researchen_US
dc.sourceSmall Ruminant Research [ISSN 0921-4488],v. 121 (1), p. 101-105en_US
dc.subject310411 Reproducciónen_US
dc.subject.otherBucken_US
dc.subject.otherSemenen_US
dc.subject.otherCryopreservationen_US
dc.subject.otherCoolingen_US
dc.subject.otherHolding timeen_US
dc.titlePost-thaw quality of buck semen samples cooled at 5°C up to 2 days before cryopreservationen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articlees
dc.typeArticlees
dc.relation.conference11th International Conference on Goats
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.11.014
dc.identifier.scopus84906944593-
dc.identifier.isi000342540800015
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005481929-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57212844863
dc.contributor.authorscopusid23091540700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35936129800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6507009446-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006639324-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57194243767-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006185082-
dc.description.lastpage105-
dc.description.firstpage101-
dc.relation.volume121-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoes
dc.contributor.daisngid30341669
dc.contributor.daisngid2567189
dc.contributor.daisngid746940
dc.contributor.daisngid1791005
dc.contributor.daisngid2128761
dc.contributor.daisngid3001453
dc.contributor.daisngid7908263
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Batista, M
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Nino, T
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Santana, M
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Alamo, D
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cabrera, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gonzalez, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gracia, A
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2014
dc.identifier.conferenceidevents120872
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,662
dc.description.jcr1,125
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medicina Veterinaria e Investigación Terapéutica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9753-4786-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameBatista Arteaga, Miguel-
crisitem.author.fullNameCabrera Martín, Fernando-
crisitem.author.fullNameGracia Molina, Anselmo-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate24-09-2012-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate27-09-2012-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.