Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51546
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBatista Arteaga, Miguelen_US
dc.contributor.authorNiño, T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSantana, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlamo, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCabrera Martín, Fernandoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGracia Molina, Anselmoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-25T01:34:38Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-25T01:34:38Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.issn0921-4488en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/51546-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to assess the influence of cool storage (5 °C) prior cryopreservation over the post-thaw quality of buck semen samples. Semen of six Majorera bucks (n = 18 ejaculates) was collected, pooled and diluted in a Tris-yolk extender. Then, diluted semen was divided into six aliquots; the first aliquot (group C) was processed and frozen in liquid nitrogen (final concentration of 400 × 106 spermatozoa/mL, 12% egg-yolk and 4% glycerol). The remaining aliquots (diluted with Tris–glucose, 12% egg yolk) were hold for 1–48 h at 4 °C: R1, the semen was cooled for 1 h; R6, the semen was cooled for 6 h; R12, the semen was cooled for 12 h; R24, the semen was cooled for 24 h and R48, the semen was cooled for 48 h. After each cooling period, a second extender was added to reach a final composition (400 × 106 spermatozoa/mL, 12% egg-yolk and 4% glycerol) similar to group C; finally, semen was packed and frozen in liquid nitrogen. After freezing–thawing, the sperm motility, acrosome integrity and the percentage of abnormal spermatozoa were assessed. No differences (P > 0.05) were detected in progressive sperm motility (mean range: 35.4–39.9%) and damage acrosomes percentages (mean: 10.8–15.5%) among the control group and the cooled semen samples (R1, R6, R12, and R24) for up to 24 h; however, R48 samples showed a lower (21.6%, P < 0.01) progressive fast spermatozoa percentage and a higher percentage of damage acrosome (38.3%, P < 0.01) than those observed in the control group and in R1, R6, R12 and R24 samples. The present study confirmed that buck semen could be preserved at 5 °C for up to 24 h before freezing; however, after 2 days of chilling, semen quality experienced a notable decrease and its utility could be lower.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSmall Ruminant Researchen_US
dc.sourceSmall Ruminant Research [ISSN 0921-4488],v. 121 (1), p. 101-105en_US
dc.subject310411 Reproducciónen_US
dc.subject.otherBucken_US
dc.subject.otherSemenen_US
dc.subject.otherCryopreservationen_US
dc.subject.otherCoolingen_US
dc.subject.otherHolding timeen_US
dc.titlePost-thaw quality of buck semen samples cooled at 5°C up to 2 days before cryopreservationen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articlees
dc.typeArticlees
dc.relation.conference11th International Conference on Goats
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.11.014
dc.identifier.scopus84906944593-
dc.identifier.isi000342540800015
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005481929-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57212844863
dc.contributor.authorscopusid23091540700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35936129800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6507009446-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006639324-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57194243767-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006185082-
dc.description.lastpage105-
dc.description.firstpage101-
dc.relation.volume121-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoes
dc.contributor.daisngid30341669
dc.contributor.daisngid2567189
dc.contributor.daisngid746940
dc.contributor.daisngid1791005
dc.contributor.daisngid2128761
dc.contributor.daisngid3001453
dc.contributor.daisngid7908263
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Batista, M
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Nino, T
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Santana, M
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Alamo, D
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cabrera, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gonzalez, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gracia, A
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2014
dc.identifier.conferenceidevents120872
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,662
dc.description.jcr1,125
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate24-09-2012-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate27-09-2012-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medicina Veterinaria e Investigación Terapéutica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9753-4786-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameBatista Arteaga, Miguel-
crisitem.author.fullNameCabrera Martín, Fernando-
crisitem.author.fullNameGracia Molina, Anselmo-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Nov 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Nov 17, 2024

Page view(s)

131
checked on Sep 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.