Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51124
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuynh, Elisabethen_US
dc.contributor.authorAraña, Jorge E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPrior, Jasonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T21:41:13Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-24T21:41:13Z-
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/51124-
dc.description.abstractThe choice of technologies used to remediate contaminated environments is increasingly made through engagement with a multitude of stakeholders including affected residents. Despite this, little is known about how residents perceive remediation technology applications. In this study a choice experiment is designed to explore ways of understanding and measuring residents' preferences for different remediation technologies approaches using a sample of 944 residents in New South Wales, Australia. Analysis reveals that the residents' acceptability of remediation technologies can be explained by both the efficacy of the technology in improving the environmental quality of the community, and the reputational value of the technology. In particular it is found that residents prefer Monitor Natural Attenuation and Bioremediation to other remediation technologies. In particular they are willing to pay an increase in yearly taxes of $44.60 and $41.15 respectively for implementing such technologies instead of alternative remediation technologies like Chemical remediation.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScience of the Total Environmenten_US
dc.sourceScience of the Total Environment [ISSN 0048-9697], v. 621, p. 1012-1022, (Abril 2018)en_US
dc.subject3303 ingeniería y tecnología químicasen_US
dc.subject3308 Ingeniería y tecnología del medio ambienteen_US
dc.subject.otherDiscrete choiceen_US
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental valuationen_US
dc.subject.otherChoice modellingen_US
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental remediationen_US
dc.subject.otherContaminationen_US
dc.subject.otherDecision makingen_US
dc.titleEvaluating residents' preferences for remediation technologies: a choice experiment approachen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.125en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85032904722-
dc.identifier.isi000424196800101-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55933380500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005207170-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24778307300-
dc.description.lastpage1022en_US
dc.description.firstpage1012en_US
dc.relation.volume621en_US
dc.investigacionIngeniería y Arquitecturaen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.description.sjr1,536-
dc.description.jcr5,589-
dc.description.sjrqQ1-
dc.description.jcrqQ1-
dc.description.scieSCIE-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0878-9934-
crisitem.author.fullNameAraña Padilla, Jorge-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
checked on Nov 24, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Page view(s)

46
checked on May 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.