Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/50723
Title: Discriminative ability of heel quantitative ultrasound in postmenopausal women with prevalent low-trauma fractures: application of optimal threshold cutoff values using CART models
Authors: Navarro, María del Carmen
Saavedra Santana, Pedro 
Gómez-de-Tejada, María Jesús
Suárez, Mercedes
Hernández, Diego
Sosa-Henríquez, Manuel 
Keywords: Clinical Risk-Factors
Hip Fracture
Vertebral Fractures
Bone Densitometry
Osteoporosis, et al
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: 1094-6950
Journal: Journal of Clinical Densitometry 
Abstract: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel has been proposed as a screening tool to evaluate the bone status and risk of osteoporotic fragility fractures. The aim of this study was to define threshold values of QUS that would maximize the predictive ability of this technique to discriminate subjects with fragility fractures. A cross-sectional analysis was made of a cohort of 1132 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 58 yr. A total of 361 women (31.9%) presented with a history of osteoporotic fracture. Most fractures (74.1%) were nonvertebral. For all patients, a questionnaire of osteoporosis risk factors and measurements of the heel QUS and bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and the proximal femur obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were assessed. Spinal radiographs were assessed for fractures and historical nonvertebral fragility fractures. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve QUS values were calculated using the optimal threshold identified in the classification and regression trees (CART) models. Cutoff values calculated from the best CART model (i.e., a quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) greater than 88.5% in women aged 58 yr or older) yielded 88.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81.4-93.5) for sensitivity, a negative predictive value of 93.8 (95% CI: 89.4-96.4), and 70.4% (95% CI: 64.6-75.7) for specificity. This cutoff value would obviate the need to perform DXA in 43.1% of the population. The area under the ROC curve of the best model was 0.8363 (95% CI: 0.8249-0.8477). In conclusion, QUS was shown to discriminate between women with and without a history of fragility fracture and constitutes a useful tool for assessing fracture risk. The application of decision trees (CART analyses) was helpful to define the optimal threshold QUS values.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/50723
ISSN: 1094-6950
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.06.008
Source: Journal of Clinical Densitometry [ISSN 1094-6950],v. 14, p. 492-498
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on May 2, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on May 2, 2021

Page view(s)

18
checked on May 8, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.