Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/50723
Título: Discriminative ability of heel quantitative ultrasound in postmenopausal women with prevalent low-trauma fractures: application of optimal threshold cutoff values using CART models
Autores/as: Navarro Rodríguez, María del Carmen 
Saavedra Santana, Pedro 
Gómez De Tejada Romero, Mª Jesús 
Suárez, Mercedes
Hernández, Diego
Sosa-Henríquez, Manuel 
Clasificación UNESCO: 32 Ciencias médicas
3205 Medicina interna
Palabras clave: Clinical Risk-Factors
Hip Fracture
Vertebral Fractures
Bone Densitometry
Osteoporosis, et al.
Fecha de publicación: 2011
Publicación seriada: Journal of Clinical Densitometry 
Resumen: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel has been proposed as a screening tool to evaluate the bone status and risk of osteoporotic fragility fractures. The aim of this study was to define threshold values of QUS that would maximize the predictive ability of this technique to discriminate subjects with fragility fractures. A cross-sectional analysis was made of a cohort of 1132 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 58 yr. A total of 361 women (31.9%) presented with a history of osteoporotic fracture. Most fractures (74.1%) were nonvertebral. For all patients, a questionnaire of osteoporosis risk factors and measurements of the heel QUS and bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and the proximal femur obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were assessed. Spinal radiographs were assessed for fractures and historical nonvertebral fragility fractures. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve QUS values were calculated using the optimal threshold identified in the classification and regression trees (CART) models. Cutoff values calculated from the best CART model (i.e., a quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) greater than 88.5% in women aged 58 yr or older) yielded 88.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81.4-93.5) for sensitivity, a negative predictive value of 93.8 (95% CI: 89.4-96.4), and 70.4% (95% CI: 64.6-75.7) for specificity. This cutoff value would obviate the need to perform DXA in 43.1% of the population. The area under the ROC curve of the best model was 0.8363 (95% CI: 0.8249-0.8477). In conclusion, QUS was shown to discriminate between women with and without a history of fragility fracture and constitutes a useful tool for assessing fracture risk. The application of decision trees (CART analyses) was helpful to define the optimal threshold QUS values.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/50723
ISSN: 1094-6950
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.06.008
Fuente: Journal of Clinical Densitometry [ISSN 1094-6950],v. 14, p. 492-498 (Octubre 2011)
Colección:Artículos
Vista completa

Citas SCOPUSTM   

7
actualizado el 15-dic-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
actualizado el 15-dic-2024

Visitas

106
actualizado el 14-dic-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.