Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/49616
Title: Vertical variability of wild fish assemblages around sea-cage fish farms: Implications for management
Authors: Dempster, Tim
Fernandez-Jover, Damian
Sanchez-Jerez, Pablo
Tuya, Fernando 
Bayle-Sempere, Just
Boyra, Arturo
Haroun, Ricardo J. 
UNESCO Clasification: 310504 Protección de los peces
251092 Acuicultura marina
Keywords: Aquaculture
Fish farm
Wild Fish
Impact
Assemblage, et al
Issue Date: 2005
Publisher: 0171-8630
Journal: Marine Ecology - Progress Series 
Abstract: Wild fish were counted in 4 depth-related strata (bottom, midwater, cage and surface) around 3 floating sea-cage fish farms (Altea, Campello, Guardamar) along the Spanish coastline and 2 farms (Los Cristianos, San Andrés) in the Canary Islands. Almost 200000 wild fish belonging to 53species were seen; representatives of Sparidae (8 species), Carangidae (6 species), Mugilidae (5species) and Chondrichthyid rays (7 species) were commonly observed. At all 5 farms, 1 to 3 taxa accounted for >74% of the abundance and >94% of the biomass of aggregated wild fish. Abundances (5.7 to 162 times) and biomasses (42 to 1728 times) of wild fish were higher in the cage stratum at the 3 Mediterranean farms than at the bottom. In contrast, abundances and biomasses of wild fish at the Canary Island farms were highest at the bottom at San Andrés and highest at the surface at Los Cristianos. Large differences in the sizes of associated fish existed among farms, with low percentages of fish >20 cm total length at Guardamar, Los Cristianos and San Andrés (11 to 25%) compared to Altea and Campello (81 to 95%). However, the greatest proportions of large fish were present in the cage stratum at each of the 5 farms. This variability suggests that assemblage structure and aggregated biomass of wild fish at farms cannot be predicted prior to their installation, causing uncertainty in modelling of nutrient dispersal. Further, the sedimentation ‘footprint’ of temperate sea-cage fish farms may vary depending on (1) the species and biomass of associated wild fish, and (2)where these fish are distributed in the water column. As wild fish consume lost feed and assimilate nutrients, we suggest that coastal managers prohibit fishing of large planktivorous species at farms to fully harness their ability to ameliorate benthic impacts.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/49616
ISSN: 0171-8630
DOI: 10.3354/meps304015
Source: Marine Ecology Progress Series [ISSN 0171-8630], v. 304, p. 15-29
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Thumbnail
Adobe PDF (807,18 kB)
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

75
checked on Nov 10, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

74
checked on Nov 10, 2024

Page view(s)

123
checked on Jun 22, 2024

Download(s)

128
checked on Jun 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.