Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/49603
Title: Evidence for impacts of nonindigenous macroalgae: A meta-analysis of experimental field studies
Authors: Thomsen, Mads S.
Wernberg, Thomas
Tuya, Fernando 
Silliman, Brian R.
UNESCO Clasification: 241705 Biología marina
Keywords: Field experiments
Impacts
Meta‐analysis
Nonindigenous macroalgal species
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: 0022-3646
Journal: Journal of Phycology 
Abstract: Invasions by nonindigenous macroalgal species (NIMS) potentially cause severe impacts on native species. We conducted a meta‐analysis of 18 field‐based manipulative experiments to quantify the direction and magnitude of impacts (Hedges effect size d, hereafter ES). We found significant small‐to‐medium negative effects on “macrophyte abundance” (cover, biomass of native taxa; EScumulative = −0.30) and medium‐to‐large negative effects on “macrophyte assemblages” (richness, diversity, total abundance; EScumulative = −0.70). In contrast, EScumulative were not significant for “macrophyte processes” (growth, mortality; EScumulative = −0.39), “animal abundance” (densities; EScumulative = −0.13), or “animal assemblages” (richness, diversity; EScumulative = 0.75). The nonsignificant effect sizes were characterized by low sample sizes and should be interpreted with caution. Three study‐specific effect sizes were particularly large (<−2.0), showing that, in specific cases, impacts can be highly negative. From a conservation perspective, focus could be on such worst‐case scenarios. Still, the reported EScumulative are likely biased toward larger effects because only the most conspicuous NIMS have been tested and because nonsignificant results are less likely to be published. To better understand the impacts of NIMS, more manipulative experiments are needed, testing more species and under contrasting environmental conditions. Future studies should include procedural control treatments and report the abundance of the NIMS to avoid ambiguous interpretations. In conclusion, current experimental evidence shows that NIMS have, on average, small‐to‐large negative impacts on native plant species and assemblages. It is possible that these effects can result in severe consequences when accumulated over long time periods and large spatial scales.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/49603
ISSN: 0022-3646
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00709.x
Source: Journal of Phycology [ISSN 0022-3646], v. 45, p. 812-819
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

97
checked on Aug 7, 2022

Page view(s)

53
checked on Apr 30, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.